web analytics

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: Statements & Documents Show That Murder and Conspiracy Charges Against James Evans Stem From Contempt Of Cop Style Justice Part VI

(Many of the facts contained in this article were derived from and are supported by the Appellate Brief of Larry Greer)

As in any criminal case, whether the process involves felony or misdemeanor crimes, the burden of proof always falls upon the prosecutor and the police officials who brought the criminal case before the courts. The law is suppose to deem all defendants innocent until proven guilty. I believe our justice system has proven countless times over, that the supposed perception of innocence perhaps, leaves much to be desired by those who find themselves standing before the courts in judgement with their lives in the balance.

Long before the gavel lands upon the courts final disposition of criminal cases, the people will have spoken in a trial where by the defendants were afforded a jury of their peers, and the entire process should have been an impartial adjudication governed by the laws of the respective jurisdiction for which the defendants have been tried. Those of us who hail from marginalized communities know all to well that such a process hasn’t exactly ever been fair to poor and indigenous people (of all races) within this country, who also know that the word of a police officer holds far more weight than any credible eyewitness a defendant could ever produce.

It wasn’t until the early 1990’s that the American public began to see the disparity and unfairness of policing in this country, when the shameful Rodney King beating case was unveiled for all to see, which depicted a culture of police violence that had long permeated our nation without scrutiny from the American public. Despite the emergence of surveillance footage of the incident being captured by a citizen, which clearly showed indisputable police brutality and excessive force, many of the officers involved were initially and shockingly acquitted of any wrong doing in the case.

Other high profile cases of police violence (excessive force), corruption, and police involved shootings of unarmed black men that have made national headlines, has placed bright lights and a microscope on police agencies around the country, which was born out of public fear, distrust, and the lack of transparency by police agencies when civilians come in contact with police officials. Also, depending upon the demographic of the communities that certain police agencies serve, the cops can do no wrong and often times a prosecutor in many of these jurisdictions can indict, prosecute, and convict a ham sandwich because the allegiance to the police is just that strong within certain sub-cultural settings in modern society.


“They harassed me so much that when ever they showed up at the door, I just started to asking them if they had a warrant, and when they said they didn’t, I just politely closed the door,” the source said.

Now in the instance case (People of Illinois vs. James Evans) over 20 years later, a mountain of information has been uncovered, with witnesses who are no longer afraid of alleged corrupt cops and the county prosecutor’s office, are now speaking up and helping formulate a classic horror story of injustice and showing exactly how ruthless, moralless, and lawless policing allegedly operated in some counties in the United States, such as Madison County Illinois during the early 1990’s.

Latosha White-Hamilton who was an alleged former co-defendant of James Evans, told TPC during a telephone interview that police officials and a prosecutor allegedly attempted to pressure her into making false statements that would implicate herself and Evans in a murder for hire conspiracy. White’s comments regarding police intimidation and coercion was not the first person who told TPC that former Alton Detective Bradley Wells, prosecutor Keith Jensen, and others used the same tactics to hold their personal criminal troubles against them, in an effort to pressure them into making false statements against James Evans.

One alleged defendant in the conspiracy to commit murder indictment, who understandably, doesn’t want to be mentioned on record, told a story which details how Detective Wells and former Detective John Lakin allegedly and repeatedly appeared at their residence harassing them to make false statements on record about Evans and a $10,000.00 murder for hire conspiracy they wanted them to falsely implicate Evans in. The story they (Wells and Lakin) allegedly wanted told was a complete fabrication, the source said. “They harassed me so much that when ever they showed up at the door, I just started asking them if they had a warrant, and when they said they didn’t, I just politely closed the door,” the source said. Then one day they in fact showed up at their residence with an actual arrest warrant which charged them with conspiracy to commit murder anyway. The source gave other statements also regarding the case, but those comments won’t be mentioned on record in fear that the information might compromise the sources identity which TPC has agreed not to disclose.

White and the unnamed source’s comments are not just intriguing because it relates to serious cases of violence and murder, its just that their individual perspectives contain similar details on how police and the county prosecutor’s office went about attempting to obtain damning statements against James Evans, and more importantly though, the comments made by them are not the only people who are now saying nearly the exact same thing. During the phone interview with White, she also pointed TPC in the direction of Mr. Larry Greer’s case, which prosecutors alleged was in fact connected to the Evans cases, and TPC has obtained a copy of Greer’s Appellate Briefing which petitions the courts to overturn his conviction in a murder case for which he received a 40 year sentence. Depending on who you believe, the brief outlines a disturbing tale where by Greer changes the comments he made to police so many times, that its disturbing and highly suspect the authorities even used his testimony during the Evans trial.

Also, when you read the Greer Appellate Brief you learn that Greer’s interaction with authorities were suspicious at the very least. It describes how Greer (an alleged known “crackhead”) gives a story pertaining to the murder of Brian Warr (an alleged co-defendant of James Evans in the Nekemar Pearson slaying) on September 12, 1998, and when the cops didn’t belief his version they initially charged him with obstructing justice, arrested him, and placed him in the county jail on those charges). Greer summonses the authorities back to the jail where he changes his statement, and implies that Evans might be involved buy saying that Warr and Evans were having problems, but didn’t identify Warr’s shooter even though he was seated right next to Warr in the vehicle when the shooting occurred. Then on October 7, 1998 Greer was arrested on a substance charge. He asked to speak to a detective Adams to whom he gave a third statement regarding the Warr killing.

During the interview with Adams Greer identifies a man name Robert Fletcher (a Crip Gang member) as the person who shot and killed Brian Warr, and admitted that he had not been truthful in his previous statements to police because he was “scared.” Following that interview with Adams, Larry Greer was released from custody. On October 29, 1998 Greer testified during Robert Fletcher’s indictment hearing while again identifying Fletcher as the person who shot and killed Warr. Greer went on to testify that Warr had a gun with a laser sight on it. The gun didn’t work but Warr (according to Greer) had been pointing it at Fletcher. Greer would later admit that he made up the story about the gun and the laser sight at Fletcher’s request in exchange for Fletcher posting his bond.

Greer wouldn’t speak to police officials pertaining to the Warr killing again until March 31, 1999 (detectives Simmons and Wells conducted the interview) after Greer allegedly received a threatening note from Fletcher. Greer, Simmons, and Wells would speak the very next day (April 1, 1999). Greer testified before the Grand Jury again later that same day, telling the same story about having lied about the gun and laser, but then stated that in 1996 Fletcher believed that James Evans had arranged to have Nekemar Pearson (Fletcher’s best friend) killed. Greer then proceeds to tell a story about Evans and Warr dealing drugs together, as Evans, Warr, Fletcher, and Greer go back and forth regarding who actually killed Pearson (Greer’s account). This is where the story becomes confusing. Fletcher allegedly tells Greer that he was offered $3000 dollars by Evans to kill Warr (a very interesting fact is, that while Greer’s alleged stories indicate that Evans and Warr sold drugs together, there was never a motive established regarding why Evans wanted Warr killed, and more importantly, it seemed to be a conflict of interest for Evans to want to hire a Crip gang member to kill any one, when the Crips were supposed to have allegedly had a hit out on Evans for the killing of Fletcher’s friend Nekemar Pearson) then there was the story that Evans gave Greer $5,000 and 4 1/2 ounces of crack cocaine to be used to pay Fletcher for the hit on Warr. The state would even produce a witness later (Jody Wesley, who was a convicted felon, who served time in federal prison, and was facing state charges at the time) who didn’t know Fletcher or Warr, but alleged that they both spoke to him at length at the county jail about the murder for hire plot on Warr. Wesley also alleged that Greer said that he was paid $1500 dollars to set up his best friend to be murdered, and that Fletcher was the person who carried it out. The brief highlights rambling details that go on and on, and really doesn’t make a lot of sense when you try to understand all of the moving parts. I won’t spoil the rest of the intricate details contained in the Larry Greer Appellate Brief, which makes good reading for a cop drama television show, except this is about the lives of real life people who allegedly went to prisoner based on very shady information allegedly fabricated and cooked up by police authorities.

Its also important to note that while Greer was simply seated in a car with Warr when he was allegedly killed by Robert Fletcher, the cops and the prosecutor’s office kept him under constant scrutiny over the Warr killing, eventually began pressuring him to falsely implicate James Evans, and it was like a cat and mouse game between Greer and the authorities. When ever he told the cops something they wanted to hear he was rewarded with his freedom, and when ever he refused, or didn’t give information that satisfactory supported the the version they wanted conveyed, he was punished with criminal charges (fact), but you’ll have to read his Appellate Brief to discover how that all played out in an extremely sickening diatribe of varying allegations contained in the Greer Appellate Brief.. (read the Larry Greer Appellate Brief in the link below)

Larry Greer Appellate Brief

“That’s their version. What they made up and wanted me to say when they held my freedom over my head, you know, and money and different things like that.”

–Larry Greer

Larry Greer would deny receiving $5000 dollars and 4 1/2 ounces of crack cocaine from James Evans. That story was created by detective Simmons and prosecutor Jensen (also corroborating allegations regarding the authorities attempting to pressure potential witnesses who were facing criminal charges of their own, into making false statements to implicate James Evans in crimes that were alleged by Ms. White and others). To highlight the irregularity and potential criminal actions taken by police authorities, when Greer testified during the Grand Jury and was released, he was paid the $1500 dollars that was used to post his bond on the obstruction of justice charges (essentially paying him for his testimony). Also, court documents based on testimony given, Greer had also been given $100 dollars in early October by a Captain Spaul and detective Bradley Wells (a gesture that was problematic and some say was done to help him feed his drug habit, and make him willing to go along with future false statements).

Larry Greer was once again arrested for a look alike substance charge from October of 1998 to February of 1999. Greer would again speak to detectives Simmons and Wells in March. At that time Detective Simmons instructed him to change his story to “this murder for hire plot that Jason Simmons orchestrated.”

Court documents indicate that Greer Stated: “He (Simmons) told me he wanted me to say that Raven (James Evans) paid me and Fletcher to have it done (Warr killing), and it ain’t what –nothing like that, and then he said, well, there’s going to be a lot of people in the near future that’s going to get on the band wagon and go along with this story. You might as well get on. I said I’m not innocent. I said this statement that I gave to the Alton Police was the true statement. It’s really what happened. He didn’t want the truth. He said innocent people go to jail all the time. That’s what he told me.”

Greer testified that he was arrested again in of June 1999 for unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon. While in custody on that charge Greer says he had a meeting with prosecutor Kieth Jensen during the first week of July at the Madison County jail. According to Greer Jensen attempted to persuade Greer into adopting the $10,000 dollar murder for hire plot, and when Greer told Jensen he would not go along with such a story the meeting abruptly ended. Greer remained in the county jail for over six months on the pistol charge. Crumbling under pressure, Greer sent word that he was prepared to admit his involvement in the Warr murder. “Yeah, I wrote a letter. They broke me down. They broke me,” Greer allegedly stated. He also allegedly said “okay I’m ready to do it y’all way.” Then another meeting was arranged, and Greer was promised that he would not be charged with murder.”

“We just want you to go along with this story because, you know, we want to get Raven (James Evans) — we’re trying to get Raven convicted on this,and we need you. The only way we’re going to get Raven tied in for this murder is we need you.”

— Prosecutor Keith Jensen, as alleged in court documents by Larry Greer

Then on January 18, 2000, Greer communicated to another detective (Golike) that the statement he made previously to authorities regarding the conversations he had with Fletcher prior to the Warr murder, and what happened on the night of the murder was not true. According to court documents once again, Greer admitted to authorities that he had not been truthful in previous statements, but while his recantations were continuously changing, they also suddenly began to remain on a consistent theme (the attempted coercion of testimony and false statements pressure from police and the prosecutor’s office). Court documents also demonstrate that Greer testified:

“No, it was — it was Keith Jensen and Jason Simmons’ story put together. Every time that — every time I gave them a story, they let me go. They wanted me to — then I’d get locked up again. They say, well, you want — you want to go, just give us a little bit more. Give — just make yourself a little bit more involved.We’re not going to charge you, but they would always say we’ve got enough evidence to charge you with murder right now, but we’re not. He’d say we are not going to charge you with murder. We just want this. We want this $10,000 dollar murder for hire story.”

–Larry Greer

On the very next day that Greer refused to testify to the story related to the $10,000 dollar murder for hire plot, at the trial of Robert Fletcher, that the state had allegedly pressured him to do, Greer was subsequently charged with murder in the killing of Brian Warr.

“My attorney Batemen then stated that Larry Greer had already signed up for the deal and told me to think about it. I replied that Larry was a ‘crackhead’ and would do and say anything to obtain drugs to get free to smoke some more, and that I was not going to lie for the state, and I wanted nothing to do with being a ‘lying snitch’. “

–Robert Fletcher

Something had change inside Larry Greer though. Some people who know him say they believe he grew a conscious after learning that the state wanted Evans eligible for the death penalty. Greer had been willing to change his story for the authorities it seems, on multiple occasions, and even implicating himself in a murder that the state never proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he was involved in. The state of course produced rebuttal witnesses denying that they ever tried to solicit the murder for hire plot to Greer, and if it wasn’t for the fact that a volume of other people had already said essentially what Greer stated about being pressured and coercion of testimony, he might simple have been dismissed as a basic “crackhead” as described by Robert Fletcher. Despite all of Greer’s recantations about crimes to the police, he still appears credible in a notarized affidavit composed on September 28, 2012, when you juxtapose the affidavit to his testimony contained in the Appellate brief, and when he admits that he couldn’t lie for the state anymore when considering the state was trying to make Evans eligible for the death penalty. (read the affidavit of Larry Greer in the link below)

Larry Greer Affidavit

There are those who will highlight Larry Greer’s consistent story retractions as a viable means to discredit his allegations against law enforcement officials ( most likely, those within sub-cultural groups who have traditionally supported police as a cultural practice), but his claims are an echoing perspective that has consistently dogged authorities involved in these serious crimes, and the list of people who say that they were coerced into telling untruths against people that officials wanted prosecuted (like James Evans), is continuously growing. The state even allegedly solicited the murder for hire plot to Robert Fletcher, according to Fletcher’s own affidavit, which was composed on June 3, 2002. In the document Fletcher claims that he was offered leniency for an actual murder, that all indications suggest he did commit, if he would just testify to James Evans being the mastermind to all of the murders surrounding the related cases. (read the affidavit of Robert Fletcher in the link below)

Robert Fletcher Affidavit

Why such visceral hatred for Evans though? To add true and proper discernment to even began rationalizing what court documents obviously depict, nothing short of a potential witch hunt by law enforcement for one man, the premise for the alleged malicious pursuit of James Evans must be resolved. Prior to his arrest, indictment and subsequent convictions, Evans had no previous history of violent crime (one drug charge that was eventual dismissed). His reputation of allegedly being a “drug dealer” that I have mentioned from the onset of shedding light on this story, might be the source of the alleged pursual coveting of one man, that is completely obsessive, even for an alleged despised drug dealer, as the crime of drug solicitation is entirely different from a murder case.

The stories surrounding Bradley Wells having a picture of James Evan’s family on his desk in his office might also shed some light on perhaps, a deep perverse sickness, obsession of capturing an unjustly targeted suspect, or a contempt of cop mindset, which some studies related to policing indicate, is typically developed by some police who deem recidivist (re[p]eat criminal defendants) as a measure of disrespect, ultimately resulting in the defendant being arrested or charged with hyper policing tactics, to get them off the street once and for all regardless if sufficient evidence exist to prove criminal activity, and by any means necessary. Whether its “contempt of cop,” corruption, or that they just simply didn’t like Evans, it isn’t the type of policing conducive for any community, any society, any civilization, and it certainly isn’t justice when law enforcement can function in this manner to maliciously send citizens to prison for decades for crimes in which they haven’t committed.

Could any of this that’s now being revealed through court documents possibly be true? Then again of course, there is still the issue of the three (3) court orders, that still hasn’t produced those tapes.

To Be Continued In A Series…

The Peop;e’s Champion

I’m Crime Blogger David Adams

0

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: The Emergence Of Witnesses And Case Files Illuminates How James Evans Never Received A Fair Trial Under The U.S. Constitution Part V

The American criminal justice system is suppose to be a vehicle in which the law governs our democracy to insure the regulation of actions by citizens within our society at large. Often times the process fails to achieve impartiality (especially when young black men become embroiled in the criminal justice system) as the law was meant to exhibit in the legitimate pursuit, attack, or ridicule of those whose actions are alleged to have infringed upon, or broken established rules created for specific aspects of the law in general. Therefore, the court system serves under an umbrella of the law where criminal cases are heard, tried, and given final disposition at an beyond a reasonable doubt standard. The case of James Evans has failed miserably to achieve adjudication of the law based on such a standard.


“If found to be true, this would not only be grounds for, at the very least a new trial for Evans, but potentially criminal consequences (for prosecutorial misconduct such as subordination of perjury) for authorities involved in the Evans prosecution. Such a discovery would also establish that prosecutors, whether intentionally or not, introduced manufactured evidence against Evans, which would be a direct violation of his right to a fair and impartial trial under the U.S. Constitution.”

Now that the list of independent eyes viewing the Evans case outside of Madison County Illinois (site of original trial) has began to grow, more scrutiny has been placed on the Evans trial and conviction as a whole, while many questionable actions allegedly taken by police officials and the state attorney’s office that prosecuted the Evans case are starting to raise eyebrows, the abnormality and inordinate delay of Mr. Evans’ post conviction appellate process serves as a reminder, if not an exacerbation of the fundamental claims of many who see the lack of impartiality by the courts in the Evans case as an established policy to deny Evans due process under the law.

The appellate ruling of Mr. Evans’ convictions establishes a higher court’s affirmation of Madison County Illinois decision of guilt, based on the evidence presented at trial where a jury of Mr. Evans’ peers in fact found him guilty of 1st degree murder, and three counts of conspiracy to commit murder. Now Evans has been pursuing his appeals to the next level, but his claims have been stalled by the court in Madison County, where by the state prosecutor’s office has failed to turn over crucial items of discovery in which Evans is rightfully entitled to under the law, and the state has failed to turn over the requested materials despite three (3) separate court orders instructing the state to do so. Not just that though, it has been well established through case law, that post conviction processes in Illinois should take just over a year and a half to be completed, but Mr. Evans has been fighting the Madison County Courts for nearly eleven years now to obtain discovery necessary to support his claims within his eventual post conviction petitions. (see the complete James Evans Appellate Rulings below)

James Evans Murder Conviction Appellate Ruling

James Evans Conspiracy Conviction Appellate Ruling

The discovery that Mr. Evans seeks is in the form of audio tapes that were played before the jury during the trial and were believed to be a crucial aspect of the case which has led to Evans’ convictions (Evans has always made his claim known, that the tapes played during trial were recordings of multiple conversations that were edited to appear as just one). If found to be true, this would not only be grounds for, at the very least a new trial for Evans, but potentially criminal consequences (for prosecutorial misconduct such as subordination of perjury) for authorities involved in the Evans prosecution. Such a discovery would also establish that prosecutors, whether intentionally or not, introduced manufactured evidence against Evans, which would be a direct violation of his right to a fair and impartial trial under the U.S. Constitution. Some experts familiar with Illinois state law have conveyed to TPC, that such inaction by the courts regarding “these type of appellate issues, while they are highly irregular, seem to be the norm down in Madison County.” The state’s failure to turn over the tapes and the court’s failure to sanction state officials who have repeatedly disobeyed a court order, in many regards is what has caused a rally behind Mr. Evans by a growing support base who see him as being a political prisoner of Madison County Illinois. What’s on those tapes that has caused such an inordinate delay by state officials to obey three separate court orders to turn over the requested tapes? (view Evans’ petition for discovery related to the audio tapes below)

Evans’ Petition For Discovery (surrounding audio tapes related to his trial)

Also, suppression of highly exculpatory evidence by the state during the trial (in the form of a police affidavit, where the officer establishes that he in fact saw the murder victim in the Evans case, alive ten days after when he was allegedly abducted and subsequently killed by Evans and co-defendants), and ineffective counsel by the late Charles Shaw (former Defense counsel who some say was literal asleep at the wheel during court proceedings) who failed to impeach testimony during the trial, of those who claim that the victim Nekemar Pearson was last seen with Evans on the day he disappeared (although Shaw had evidence in his possession that disputed such allegations, where a witness name Lakiesha Steele told authorities that Pearson had in fact been chased and fired upon with guns by members of the family of Willie Nicholes on the day he disappeared, and that Pearson held up at her home to escape his alleged assailants). Pearson was in fact on house arrest for the murder of Willie Nicholes, and the date of his alleged disappearance was the one year anniversary of the Nicholes slaying. All of this evidence clearly lay out in documents of the case discovery as a matter of record. Yet, state authorities call the Evans conviction a solid case of justice, despite the fact that many who testified against him were either paid for their testimonies, given leniency, or granted immunity for their own personal criminal strife (fact). Some of these problematic issues of the Evans conviction are so rudimentary to established case law where Evans is similarly situated, that his case entirely appears to be a blatant violation of not just laws governing the state of Illinois, but some admit could be direct violation of federal statute, and more than likely the primary premise for the abnormality or inordinate delay of his appellate process by the Madison County courts.

In further discourse regarding the subject audio tapes, Mr. Evans’ claims are supported by an alleged co-defendant of his conspiracy to commit murder cases. In a recent interview with Ms. Latosha White-Hamilton, she conveyed that she was charged along side Mr. Evans for conspiring to kill Brian Warr, his father Lester Warr, and Clifton Wheeler (Brian Warr and Clifton Wheeler were also supposedly co-defendants of Mr. Evans’ in the murder case of Nekemar Pearson). Her alleged involvement in the murder conspiracies are related to her selling a firearm to a man name Tommy Rounds (Mr. Evans’ first cousin), who she says Detective Bradley Wells and state prosecutor Kieth Jensen attempted to pressure her into falsely stating that Evans had directed her to sell Rounds a gun, for the purpose of killing Lester Warr, and others who were alleged to have been targets of the murder conspiracy. White said the allegations were completely fabricated, and one of the reasons that she refused to falsely testify to the false allegations against Evans, because she learned that Rounds (an alleged known career confidential police informant) was wearing a wire for police authorities at the time she made the gun sale. White stated that she was never concerned about the murder conspiracy charge due to the entire story being a fabrication by an alleged corrupt detective name Brad Wells, but admitted that she was guilty of selling Rounds a firearm for which she legally had no license to do. White was so contrite with her involvement in the selling of a weapon, that she says she had even prepared to go to prison for her actions related to the firearm.

During the interview White went on to describe how she had no knowledge of the murder case for which Evans was convicted of killing Nekemar Pearson, because when she first met Mr. Evans, Pearson had already gone missing. “There were already posters around town seeking information about his disappearance when I met James,” she stated. She told TPC that she refused to tell a lie in court against Evans because despite pressure from Wells and the prosecutor’s office, she knew that their wasn’t anything on the wire recording (if they had a good connection) warn by police CI Tommy Rounds that could implicate her in any conspiracy to commit murder on anyone. White says she was embroiled in the case for over five (5) years until she finally plead out for the felony conviction of selling a firearm without a state license, a charge she willingly admitted she was guilty of.


“There was something F***** Up about those tapes. Wells and them did something to those tapes, that’s exactly why I never worried about the conspiracy charges. I kept telling my attorney to listen to the tapes, because I knew they were lying about the conspiracy charges.”

— Latosha White-Hamilton

However, when I discussed the allegations that Wells alleged regarding the gun sale being a directive given to her by Evans, she said that Evans did contact her regarding Rounds, but it was for a request to give Rounds money because he had just got out of prison. White went on to say that she simply thought Rounds needed monies to get back home to where he was from, but when she met Rounds (unsuspectingly by her) he was wearing a wire for police officials, and he asked her if she could help him get a gun. White said that her late ex who had been killed in a shooting involving the St Louis police, had a gun that was contained inside a shoe box that had been stored in a closet at her home. White alleges that she didn’t want the gun in her house and was willing to sell the weapon to Rounds, which she in fact did. White said that the audio tape that was probably produced from the wire Rounds wore would reflect what she described to TPC regarding her sale of the firearm to Rounds (she was never worried about conspiracy to commit murder charges because she knew that the tape didn’t record such a transaction, and deemed the murder conspiracy charges as a mere scare tactic by Wells and the state to force her to play ball in their fabricated story of supposed murder conspiracy crimes against James Evans).

The interview of Ms. White also revealed some other interesting parts of the case. White who had just recently spoken to Mr. Evans prior to her interview with TPC, hadn’t done so for over 20 years, as part of her plea agreement and condition of probation was to not have contact with Evans. Her comments regarding the alleged inculpatory tapes against her, Evans, and others were in fact inaudible she recalls, a claim that Evans has also consistently made regarding the tapes. Like Evans, White who states that she had the tapes for years before they were lost during her family’s move to another residence, describes the tapes as having a fuzzy sound during certain parts of the recordings (white noise), which made them inaudible and not understandable to an objective listener of the tapes. “There was something F***** Up about those tapes. Wells and them did something to those tapes, that’s exactly why I never worried about the conspiracy charges. I kept telling my attorney to listen to the tapes, because I knew they were lying about the conspiracy charges,” White told TPC during the interview.

At times during the interview White also voiced her anger, at the top of her voice at times, regarding the allegations of conspiring to kill Lester Warr. “Why on earth would we conspire to kill Lester? Why would we do that, and for what reason, White conveyed. It is a shame of what Wells and the state did to James,” she said. Her comments also supported claims outlined in testimony documents regarding Mr. Larry Greer who was convicted for involvement in the murder of Brian Warr. White says that Greer was simply sitting in a vehicle with Warr when a man name Robert Fletcher, a known Crip gang member and personal friend of Nekemar Pearson, shot and killed Brian Warr for his alleged involvement in the Pearson slaying. White explains that Greer drove Warr to the hospital and was subsequently charged and convicted in the Warr killing. She says that despite Greer’s efforts in a failed attempt to save Warr’s life by driving him to the hospital after he was shot, Wells initially charged him with obstruction of justice, then solicited him to make false statements against Evans pertaining to the Pearson murder. She says Greer played ball, testifying against Evans at his trial, but then Wells and state officials reneged on Greer’s immunity promise, and pursued charges against Larry Greer surrounding the Warr killing which resulted in a conviction and a 40 year sentence. White conveyed that anybody in Alton around that time who were connected to James Evans, that ran into criminal trouble, were pressured into making false statements against James. “Everyone who did were given deals on their charges, and like me, those who didn’t, were punished with aggressive prosecution that resulted in convictions and in some instances, lengthy prison sentences. Because of Brad Wells I have that felony gun charge over my head to this day because I wouldn’t lie against James Evans. I’m sorry, that’s something I just couldn’t do,” White said.


“true justice can only be served in the form of Bradley Wells being indicted for the crimes that he allegedly committed while he was a detective for the Madison County Sheriff Department.”

— A source on conditions of anonymity

Along side the comments made by Latosha White-Hamilton during her interview with The People’s Champion Blog, are comments made by others who spoke on conditions of anonymity out of so much fear of retaliation from police authorities and Crip gang members for what they know, that I am not even authorized to publish their comments regarding the case. I can only say that their comments are aligned with what has already be revealed regarding the coercion of false statements and testimony under duress while being pressured by Detective Wells and others.

Some of what people said under anonymity was very forthright and critical of the Alton Community for their belief in Evans’ guilt as outlined in local media. They argue that Evans was convicted long before his trial had ever began. Also, the Crip gang was harshly criticized for the violence within the community, and “for all of the tough guy, macho, gang banging persona that many of the wannabe thugs attempted to display around Alton, when those white cops like Brad Wells got whole of their a**es, they turned into little bitches. Its one thing to tell police what you know in an effort to save your self from a lengthy prison sentence, while you might be considered a snitch, people might understand why you did it. Crumbling under pressure for petty shoplifting theft charges, or allowing yourself to be pressured into making up some stuff to send a person to jail for sh*t you know he didn’t commit, is not even snitching. That’s being a bitch plain an simple,” the source told TPC. Others have also said that they hope the truth finally emerges about what happened to Nekemar Pearson, and that “true justice can only be served in the form of Bradley Wells being indicted for the crimes that he allegedly committed while he was a detective for the Madison County Sheriff Department.”

To Be Continued As Part Of A Series …

The People’s Champion

I’m Crime Blogger David Adams

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: How Madison County Illinois Can Make An Innocent Man A Murderer Part IV

In the first few articles related to the James Evans wrongful conviction for murder case, I highlighted some critical points, made some strong accusations against law enforcement officials, and even provided actual documents from the case file to demonstrate just how flawed and problematic the James Evans case was. Given what we know about some police agency’s criminal tactics in modern American policing, it should come as no surprise that these kinds of heinous acts of corruption and crimes allegedly committed by cops and the Madison County prosecutor’s office are finally being brought to the surface.

After all, there are a plethora of convicts around the entire American criminal justice system seeking post conviction relief for some of the very same claims that are being made in the Evans case. Police misconduct which include intimidation of witnesses, coercion of testimony, the subordination of perjury, and suppression of exculpatory evidence by the Madison County prosecutor’s office are just a few of the problematic elements of Evans’ case that can be proven if anyone cared to just look at his case file.

“Most of the people they brought into court, one after another to testify against James Evans, were in shackles and handcuffs from correctional facilities.”

It should be reiterated that Evans’ trial and subsequent conviction for Murder and solicitation of murder were predicated on a mountain of lies allegedly fabricated by Detective Bradley Wells, John Lakin and County Prosecutor Kieth Jensen, who allegedly collaborated to concoct a fake story of a retaliatory murder, solicitation of murder, then subverted the facts, and concealed the truth to send an innocent man to prison (sound familiar?). The police officials allegedly used a cast of extremely shady characters in a completely circumstantial case, to obtain a conviction. Evans could even have received the death penalty in these cases.

As one person who was there during the trial stated, “most of the people they brought into court, one after another to testify against James Evans, were in shackles and handcuffs from correctional facilities.” This just seems incredulous that these characters who all had lengthy criminal histories, were deemed credible, without forensics, incriminating ballistics, a weapon, and other damning evidence usually present in a capitol murder case (fact). Essentially the state had nothing by way of physical evidence linking Evans to the crime, except testimony from known criminals who are believed to have testified for plea deals in exchange for leniency related to their own criminal strife.

Not just that though, but the state hid some extremely pertinent information from the Evans’ jury that would have been fruitful to his defense. Its well established now that an Alton Police Detective (Cooley) wrote an affidavit declaring that the victim (Nekemar Pearson) was seen alive by him 10 days after Evans and others were supposed to have abducted him and murdered him. They concealed other crucial facts also. The man who Evans was convicted for soliciting his murder (Brian Warr), allegedly confessed to Detective Brad Wells that Evans, Clifton Wheeler, and himself killed Pearson and discarded his body in a wooded area in Godfrey Illinois. Yet, Warr was suffering from mental illness. In fact Warr had recently signed himself out of a health facility where he was being treated for mental health related illness, around the time he gave his confession implicating Evans, Wheeler, and himself in the subject murder.

“Brian Warr had lost his mind and the state knew he was sick, but they used his false testimony to convict me. He was also supposed to have confessed on video recording, but it was never played during my trial.”

   — James Evans

Evans’ claim that the state knew about Warr’s mental health issues has tremendous credibility, especially when you consider the testimony of police Detective Bradley Wells, who admitted to allegedly extracting a confession from Warr. After Warr confessed to being involved in the Pearson murder, he was allowed to leave the police station and go home (some say Wells released him so he could be killed by Crip gang members, in retaliation for Pearson’s killing). Warr’s alleged mental instability was problematic for police authorities if you follow the logic of this case. Warr was subsequently gunned down the very night that news broke that he and Evans had allegedly murdered Pearson. In reality it appears that a mentally ill Brian Warr was allegedly manipulated by Brad Wells for his supposed confession and involvement in the Pearson murder, and then fed him to the wolfs on the streets (crip gang members) to have him exposed of, and making certain no one ever discovered that he was in fact sick.

More importantly, Warr’s admission not only places him at the scene of the abduction and subsequent murder of Pearson, but he along with Clifton Wheeler (by Warr’s alleged account) allegedly acted in harmony with Evans during this capital murder. Notwithstanding that the alleged events that Warr and Wheeler both describe, as testified to by Det. Brad Wells during James Evans’ indictment hearing, don’t match the actual facts that the state presented at trial. In fact, what Wells testified to during the indictment regarding what he alleges was told by Warr and Wheeler, was so far removed from the established facts indicated in the autopsy report raise serious credibility issues with their account (that’s of course if you even believe the testimony of Bradley Wells). After all, Wells told the Grand Jury that Warr’s alleged eyewitness account indicated that Evans shot Pearson twice in the chest before he began walking back to the car. However, the autopsy clearly demonstrates that a projectile was retrieved from the “right lateral aspect of the vertebra” (rib area) in Pearson’s remains, and that another projectile was extracted from “the right vertebral column between the 11th and 12th intervertebral disc.

These technical details are extremely alarming when you consider Wells’ indictment testimony juxtapose to other elements contained in the autopsy findings. I mean its not rocket science, its literally in the report where the medical examiner even states, “the chest and abdominal skin were still in tact”. Now, either Wells clearly hadn’t seen the autopsy report himself prior to his indictment testimony, or he perjured himself during the Grand Jury indictment hearing. If Wells in fact read the autopsy report himself, then there is no way possible as a matter of science, at the very least, can he realistically accept Brian Warr’s alleged confession to have any merit whatsoever.

Transcripts from the actual trial indicated that after the alleged crime scene had been processed by police, casings were discovered in the field in Godfrey, and two projectiles were discovered at the coroner’s office at the Madison County morgue. These facts don’t align with the alleged statements that Brian Warr supposedly made to Brad Wells. During the Evans indictment hearing, Wells testified before the Grand Jury that Warr admitted to being an eyewitness to the Pearson killing, that Evans allegedly shot him twice in the chest, and as he turned to walk away he heard an additional 6 more gunshots. That’s a total of 8 gunshots according to the information that Wells told the Grand Jury to help obtain an indictment of James Evans (where are the other 5 bullets?). I mean was he shooting in the air? Why weren’t more projectiles recovered at the scene? You really have to call BS when you see it, because for all intent and purposes, the autopsy clearly demonstrates that Pearson was shot in the lower abdominal area of the body. Its easy to conclude that Wells probably didn’t believe Warr’s story, that’s more than likely why he let him go, and as he should have expected, based on the climate of gang activity during the time, Brian Warr was killed within 48 hours after Wells publicized that he was involved in the Pearson murder.

Its unfortunate that these kinds of inconsistencies occur during serious court cases involving violent crimes. There is always a rush to judgement and it seems that the Grand Jury is often told a volume of information that often times during the actual trial, is either proven to be false or contradictory. That’s exactly what happened in this case. Also, the Grand Jury was also misled when the state attorney asked Wells under oath if Pearson had ever been seen alive again by anyone after the date of his alleged abduction and subsequent murder, and Wells responded in the negative by stating “no”. That was untruthful because the Cooley report which indicates that an Alton police detective had seen Pearson walking down the street in Alton ten days after he was suppose to have been murdered, entirely dismantles the abduction and murder story that Wells testified to before the Grand Jury during the indictment proceedings. (Read a portion of Brad Well’s indictment testimony below that was given before a Grand Jury which resulted in James Evans being indicted for the murder of Nekemar Pearson, and the actual autopsy report of Pearson that was presented during the actual trial).

Detective Bradley Wells Grand Jury Testimony

Official Autopsy Summary of Nekemar Pearson

 

There are so many moving parts to the James Evans conviction that its too many to  met out here in a blog post, and even if I meticulous spelled it all out for the public to see, it would serve no justice, because James Evans’  battle ground should be in a court of law. That’s exactly why I am informing the public about this horrible wrongful conviction. For over 20 years now Mr. Evans has been fighting the Madison County criminal justice system, a system that has denied him his right to post conviction appeal. Its one thing to say that all convicted felons and murderers will always claim or profess their innocence to get out of prison, and in many cases convicts don’t ever get out of prison because the evidence is mounted too high against them.

In other cases state attorneys comply with orders of the appellate process and turn over all records as mandated and ordered by the courts, and many times state prosecutors do so with confidence knowing they prosecuted the case within the letter of the law. In the Evans trial there were audio recordings played for the jury which allegedly has Evans implicating himself in the Pearson murder, and conspiring or soliciting the murder of Brian Warr. Evans has been asking for the tapes since his conviction to have them forensically tested, because he says the tapes were doctored (multiple conversations edited to appear as one). Unfortunately, Evans has spent years trying to get those audio tapes for the purpose of testing. He wrote letters to his lawyers, filed motions to force the state to comply with discovery laws, and all of his efforts fell short to obtain the subject audios which are crucial to his post conviction appellate process. (View below link of James Evans’ petition for release of discovery audio, filed on September 27, 2006)

James Evans Petition For Release Of Audio Discovery

Despite an order entered by the Third Judicial Circuit Court of Madison, County, Illinois, directing the Madison County Prosecutor’s office to turn over the subject tapes to Mr. Evans, which occurred on December 16, 2008, the County prosecutor to this day has yet to comply with this court order with impunity. The County’s failure to comply with the Court’s directive has stalled Mr. Evans’ appellate process which has been at bar in Madison County for over a decade now.  The issue has been unresolved for so long that his case has been taken off of the Court Docket.

“I haven’t had a court date or hearing in 18 months.”

    — James Evans

Evans would eventually have the opportunity to pray his appeal before the Illinois State Supreme Court if his petition fails at the Third Judicial Circuit level, but Evans can’t even get over the basic rudimentary process of obtaining discovery items which he is entitled to per federal law (Brady vs. Maryland). Why is that? How could the Circuit Court of Madison County allow such blatant disregard for the Court and the law, for that matter, and for so long by the county prosecutor’s office? While these kind of stalling tactics by prosecutors who were successful in convicting suspicious cases are not uncommon, its simply another glaring irregularity in a mountain of other problematic elements of the Evans conviction that is beginning, and rightfully so, starting to not only raise eyebrows on the Evans case, but how they conduct business within the Madison County Illinois judicial system as a whole. (View the below links of the 2008 Third Judicial Circuit Court of Madison County Judge’s order for the state prosecutor to turn over all audio tapes to Evans, and a volume of other correspondences related to Evans’ failed attempts to obtain discovery items in his case)

Court Order For Discovery Release In Evans vs. The People of Illinois

Correspondences Related To Obtaining Discovery Audios

 

Its important to note that anyone, and you don’t have to be an attorney to figure out what’s going on regarding these matters. Common sense and basic reasoning from even a skeptic can easily resolve, that if the Madison County Prosecutor’s office had James Evans dead to right with indisputable incriminating evidence on those audio tapes related to this murder and solicitation of murder case, they would have turned the tapes over in days, a week at the most, within the time frame of receiving the Court’s order to do so. Their failure to turn over discovery materials that were part of the trial record, the obvious suppression of exculpatory evidence, established subordination of perjury, the plea dealings & reduction of sentences in violent crime cases with extremely shady characters who testified against Evans, monetary payouts for coerced testimony, and intimidation of witnesses (all which are alleged to have occurred in this case) combine a compelling story of wrongful conviction in the Evans case.

Now I know that all seems like such a broad, generalized, and speculated pile of dong right? After all, Evans was convicted by a jury of his peers right? Besides what do I know, I’m just a blogger. I can read and comprehend well. That’s why after reading through hundreds of documents related to the Evans conviction, I can convey with confidence that it all doesn’t add up to Evans being the perpetrator of the crimes for which he was tried and subsequently convicted. When I consider all of the information that I have brought to the surface related to his case, the suspicion related to those audio tapes which were suppose to be damning for Evans, is perhaps the most compelling aspect of the record that points to prosecutorial misconduct and potentially other crimes allegedly committed within the Madison County Sheriff’s office related to the James Evans case.

For instance, a Madison County Sheriff report indicates that Det. Bradley Wells had made copies of 19 tapes related to the Evans case and turned them over to the state prosecutor’s office as required by discovery laws. (View the document in the below link)

List Of Discovery Tapes Allegedly Turned Over To County Prosecutor

“This is a list of all audio recordings allegedly submitted for discovery. Only two of them I have ever heard, due to them being played in trial. I have never heard any of the others and they were not played at time of my trial (99-CF-634).”

   — James Evans

Now due to the bizarre circumstances which are unexplained pertaining to Madison County’s failure to turn over the subject tapes to Mr. Evans per a Court Order issued on December 16, 2008, the Court issued a second order regarding the exact same discovery tapes related to the Evans case on June 14, 2011 (five years later). Only problem though, is the tape list contained in the new order was now a total of only 15, minus 4 from the original list of 19 tapes in total. Also, the tapes are now titled differently in the second court order compared to the original list (Why is that?). Compare the two list of tapes and you do the math. (View the below link for the list of discovery tapes listed in second court order for tapes to be turned over to Evans)

List Of Tapes In Second Court Order

 

“This transcript is what is alleged to be on the tapes in question. Much of the transcripts are completely fictitious. Words/phrases included in the transcripts that were never uttered.”

“Sections were removed or drowned out by white noise (static).”

   — James Evans

Audio Transcripts Allegedly From Tapes At Issue In Evans Case

 

If the provided transcripts of the subject audio tapes at issue were considered even slightly by the jury to convict Mr. Evans, then you would really have to question the competence of those seated in the jury (all white citizens from rural Illinois). A good portion of these supposedly damning and alleged inculpatory tapes against Evans were rendered “not understandable” by who ever interpreted what was suppose to be on those tapes (or was that done for some other reason?) The transcripts do not follow logical discourse in a conversation, and a lot of the words don’t make sense for a reader when attempting to follow the conversation in its transcribed form. At least now we know why the Madison County Prosecutor’s Office has never turned those tapes over to Mr. Evans in over ten years, despite two court orders directing them to do so. #justicedelayedisjusticedenied #freejamesevansnow

 

To Be Continued (in a series)…

 

The People’s Champion

I’m Crime Blogger David Adams

 

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: The James Evans Frame Up And The Suborn Of Perjury By A State Prosecutor (Part III Of A Series)

By the time most people become aware of many of these alarming allegations against law enforcement officials in Illinois, damage control will more than likely have been well under way, while those who have been accused tap into their respective political networks to put out the flames of some very disturbing crimes that they are now openly and publicly being accused of. Some people have already said they know about this story and believe I may have received the wrong information pertaining to the Nekemar Pearson murder and subsequent conviction of Mr. James Evans for this capitol crime over twenty years ago in the town of Alton Illinois.

To many I’m sure, the emerging claims (that have now surfaced after all this time, with a voice outside of the political backdrop of Madison County Illinois) will seem too farfetched and highly unbelievable. Just like it was highly unbelievable to Mr. Evans’ family and friends during the 90’s when this case first broke in the media, that he could have even been capable of committing such a heinous crime. Perhaps to those in doubt, its also probably highly unbelievable that former detective Brad Wells allegedly parked his police vehicle outside of James Evans’ mother home on a regular after he had already been convicted and sent to prison, as an alleged scare tactic to discourage her efforts to bank roll her son’s (James) legal expenses for his appeals, and created such a frightening ordeal for her I’m told, that the stress from Wells’ alleged harassment would cause her to have a stroke so severe that she remains incapacitated to this day (Fact).

While Wells and Lakin are alleged to have violated the law along with the rights of many young black men they arrested and eventually had prosecuted, former Madison County Illinois prosecutor Keith Jensen almost certainly must have allegedly quarterbacked many of these criminal acts. As prosecutor it was his task to determine the validity of crimes in which any defendant is charged with, and it was also his duty to establish the credibility of state witnesses that are called before the court to assist in proving beyond a reasonable doubt that criminal defendants are in fact guilty of the crimes for which they are charged and convicted. I believe based on documents that I received and interviews that I have conducted with those who are familiar with this case, Keith Jensen and the men in women of the jury in The People of Illinois vs. James Evans fell short in establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that James Evans in fact killed Nekemar Pearson, and conspired to have alleged co-defendant (in the Pearson murder) Brian Warr murdered as well.

As I have already explained in a previous article related to this case, the entire James Evans indictment was problematic from the gate. Based on testimony from highly questionable and shady characters (individuals with criminal histories and pending criminal charges at the time of their indictment and trial testimonies), the prosecution couldn’t establish as a matter of fact whether Pearson was killed in Evans’ home/backyard or further north in a field in Godfrey Illinois. This was evident by virtue of how testimonies of state witnesses shifted drastically during Evans’ actual trial, from what they had previously told grand jurors during Evans’ indictment hearing.

During the trial of James Evans in the Pearson murder, it was the State’s contention (or Keith Jensen’s for the most part) that Evans killed Pearson for a home invasion robbery at Evans’ home by Pearson and another man name Marcus Hollaway. Its established as a matter of fact in the discovery of the Evans’ trial for the murder of Pearson, that prosecutor Jensen  allegedly was well aware that Hollaway and Pearson were the actual individuals who robbed Evans during the invasion of his home. However, detective Wells who extracted a confession from Hollaway regarding the crime, never pursued criminal charges against him (Holloway), and a fact that created tremendous suspension within the Alton community that Hollaway may had allegedly aided Wells in creating the entire fabricated story of Evans having been responsible for Pearson’s murder. At every step of my investigation into this case, the most prevalent question that persist, is “why wasn’t Hollaway ever indicted for the Evans home invasion robbery (that just doesn’t make any sense).

I mean let’s face it, you mean to tell me you openly confess to the police regarding a serious violent crime like home invasion, armed robbery, and kidnapping, but you get to walkout of the police station and go home the same day with no criminal charges against you? Something just doesn’t past the smell test (even from an outsider’s perspective), James Evans has consistently conveyed that he only learned Hollaway and Pearson were the perpetrators of the robbery that occurred at his home from detective Wells, long after Pearson had gone missing. If this is true, it destroys the state’s entire theory and motive as to why they say Evans killed Pearson in the first place (Reasonable doubt). Its also highly believable that Evans in fact didn’t learn until much later on because sources I’ve spoken to say that Holloway and Pearson were regulars at Evans’ home while playing video games, months after the home invasion had occurred. If there was any validity to Wells’ and Jensen’s alleged theory in Pearson’s killing being in retaliation, why would Evans allow the men responsible (Holloway and Pearson) into his home to socialize on many occasions for months after he had been robbed? Why?

Terrence Cooley’s (now deceased) grand jury testimony corroborates James Evans’ claim that he learned of Nekemar Pearson’s involvement after he had gone missing (read an excerpt from his testimony below):

The Terrence Cooley Grand Jury Testimony

“Terrence Cooley testified before the grand jury in my trial, and after his testimony, Bradley Wells (the lead detective), realizing where he was employed, kept making appearances at his place of employment. Wells told Cooley that he would continue disrupting his job until his employer terminated him. Terrence Cooley would also, later sign an affidavit attesting to Bradley Wells badgering him and suppling him with false information to give under oath. Due to the inordinate delay of post conviction proceedings in my case, Terrence Cooley has passed away and is no longer available to testify and put his affidavit on record.”

  James Evans

Cooley’s admission of Wells having attempted to influence him with false statements is one of the very aspects of this case where the suborn of perjury was initiated. Michael Hooks, Larry Greer, Clifton Wheeler, Judy Huff, Tommie Rounds (jail house snitch) Jody Wesley (jail house snitch), William Jenkins (jail house snitch), Keyanna Simpson, Ms. Mary Berry (James’ mother), and a volume of others who out of fear for their individual safety, I will decline to mention publicly, were either facing criminal charges of their own, jail house informants who more than likely may also have allegedly been under duress during their testimonies, or were allegedly the subject of continued harassment by Wells, who they claim either showed up at their places of employment continuously or followed them around.

“Detective Bradley Wells would burst into my jail cell when no one was around and threaten me and my mother. Wells told me straight to my face that I better tell my mother to back off or she is gonna be in jail next.”

James Evans

The state’s alleged motive for murder during the Evans trial wasn’t the only aspect of the case that doesn’t make sense, the case was prosecuted on pure circumstantial evidence (with no forensics what so ever connecting James Evans to the crime). In fact, there isn’t one shred of discovery that confirms that a dead body was ever in the Evans’ home, as some state witnesses alleged during the indictment proceedings and during the actual murder trial (if its anywhere in the case discovery, I would love to see it). Also, state witnesses testified that three bullets (9 millimeter) were discovered  between the actual alleged crime scene (1 projectile) and during the autopsy (2 projectiles), yet no gun belonging to Evans was ever confirmed to be a ballistic match for the recovered projectiles associated with this case. Instead, the state relied upon the testimony of some very shady witnesses who all collectively were facing pending criminal charges themselves, as the primary foundation to establish Evans’ guilt in the crime..

The demographic dynamics of the jury pool at Mr. Evans’ trial is also a story for another day, considering the setting was a small mid-west town just a stone’s throw from Ferguson, and St Louis Missouri. As I have constantly conveyed, a murder case by an alleged drug dealer in the mid 1990’s in a small western community, unaccustomed to the kind of criminal activity and violence that was happening all over the country, and now suddenly beginning to emerge in the surrounding Madison Illinois County, perhaps made a conviction inevitable for a young black man solely on mere suspicion alone.

Those interested in true justice should preface the details of the case in this manner:

  1. No forensics connected Evans to the murder.
  2. No ballistics were linked to the murder weapon, and no gun was ever linked to Mr. Evans.
  3. The body was too decomposed to make a positive identification (found with no clothing, only a watch).
  4. No scientific evidence was ever presented during trial establishing that the body officials say found in a wooded area in Godfrey Illinois, were the remains of Nekemar Pearson as a matter of forensic pathology or scientific fact (Fact).
  5. The established record in the case (Indictment Testimony and trial testimony) indicates that the solicitation of bribery, coercion of written false statements, and the Subordination of perjury were all elements of this capitol murder case.

The entire story related to how James Evans became a suspect in the murder of Nekemar Pearson, prosecuted, subsequently convicted, and sentenced to over a hundred years in an Illinois state prison is a like a script straight out of the epic film “The Hurricane.” The case is a real life story which contained a cast of suspect characters with extensive criminal histories who aligned with the state for sweet deals of leniency against James Evans, alleged corruption by Madison County police officials, and alleged subordination of perjury (a federal crime) by the state prosecutor’s office, and ineffective counsel for the defendant (Mr. Evans),

The criminal case of James Evans vs. The People of Illinois was born on the foundation of alleged solicitation of bribery for false statements and testimony, allegedly orchestrated by former detective Bradley Wells, John Lakin, and former Madison Illinois County prosecutor Keith Jensen. It was Julius Newton (deceased) who first attempted to advise the state and a grand jury about Brad Wells allegedly offering him money ($1,000) to act as a Confidential Informer, by obtaining information via a hidden wired recording device, but apparently no one took his claims seriously. However, the established record in this case reveals that there was a consistent pattern of known liars in trouble with the law, one criminal defendant who routinely acted as an agent for the state, and all compiled in a bizarre storyline that’s admittedly difficult to follow. (Link to Julius Newton’s Grand Jury Testimony below)

Grand Jury Testimony of Julius Newton

Michael Hooks

While Mr. Hooks was allegedly a self admitted liar and didn’t testify at James Evans’ trial, he was brought into court in handcuffs, wearing a prison uniform, and was scheduled to be released when he testified at the Evans indictment hearing. Hooks had a criminal history and allegedly solicited a bribe from Evans just as Wells had offered him for false testimony.

“Hooks approached me and told me that investigators were offering $1,000.00 dollars to testify falsely and avoid criminal charges. Hooks told me that if I could “top the $1,000.00 dollar offer” that detective Wells allegedly made to him for false testimony in the Nekemar Pearson murder, then he wouldn’t testify to it in court.”

James Evans

Its believed that Hooks was allegedly offered a deal for leniency or early release by prosecutor Keith Jensen, in exchange for the false testimony that detective Wells had solicited a $1,000.00 dollar bribe from him for. Hooks’ grand jury testimony is important because it establishes as a matter of fact, that he only heard gun shots on the day that Pearson was allegedly abducted by Evans, Brian Warr, and another unidentified man (suspected to be Clifton Wheeler). Its also believed to be ground zero from which the entire convoluted story allegedly fabricated by Wells, Lakin, and prosecutor Jensen derived, to have James Evans framed for the murder of Nekemar Pearson. (Click the below link to read an excerpt from Michael Hooks’ Grand Jury testimony)

Michael Hooks Grand Jury Testimony

 

Demond Spruill

The introduction of well known jail house informer Demond Spruill should have been extremely problematic for the state in Evans vs. The People of Illinois, because he had consistently been used by the state as an informer in a volume of other criminal cases prior to his grand jury and trial testimony in the James Evans case. Spruill’s ability to acquire confessions of criminal suspects was so alarming that Illinois State Supreme Court Justices overturned a murder conviction in Brown vs. The People of Illinois, primarily because Spruill was used by the state to surreptitiously obtain incriminating statements from Brown while at the Madison County Jail, without the presence of his appointed legal counsel, and in violation of the 6th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

“Spruill gathered this additional evidence of the defendant’s guilt as an arm of the prosecution, at a time when the defendant was indicted, arraigned, and represented by counsel. Thus, the defendant unwittingly provided the prosecution with recordings of himself saying things that evinced consciousness of guilt on the pending murder charges, while his legal representative slept, totally unaware of the fact that the prosecution had decided to contact his client and have a few words with him. The defendant uttered more than a few self-incriminating words into a State-sponsored microphone attached to a dedicated line at the Granite City police department, at a time when the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution guaranteed counsel’s presence during any communication between State agents and the defendant. See Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 12 L. Ed. 2d 246, 84 S. Ct. 1199 (1964); see also Maine v. Moulton, 474 U.S. 159, 88 L. Ed. 2d 481, 106 S. Ct. 477 (1985).”

   Justice Keuhn, Illinois State Appellate Court 5th District

 

“When Spruill reported to an Alton detective another in a long line of jailhouse confessions, arrangements were made to allow for his release on his own recognizance. Despite his claim that he expected nothing in return for the confession that he could now provide, he did not again run from authorities. However, he did again arm himself with a handgun. While on recognizance bond, awaiting trials for armed robbery, conspiracy to commit home invasion, illegal use of weapons, and aggravated discharge of a .40-caliber semiautomatic handgun, Spruill was arrested in St. Louis, Missouri, and charged by federal authorities for being a convicted felon in possession of yet another firearm. Clearly, Spruill had violated the conditions of his bail release. He left the state without permission and committed another crime. However, the State did not initiate any new charges because of the bail violations.”

“In any event, Spruill’s testimony was extremely vulnerable to attack, if left uncorroborated. His unrepentant criminality, juxtaposed with his remarkable ability to escape punishment for his evil ways, could have easily cast doubt upon his credibility. With a character that reflected dishonesty and utter disdain for things moral and law-abiding, anything Spruill said was suspect, particularly in light of his pattern of using jailhouse confessions as a means to his own selfish ends. There was no reason to believe that he did not expect to benefit handsomely from his testimony, when his sundry past performances always wrought substantial benefits in how he got treated.” 

    Justice Brennan, Illinois State Appellate Court 5th District

Read the entire Appellate Court opinion in Brown vs. The People of Illinois here.

 

Its now clear why the Testimony of Demond Spruill in the James Evans indictment hearing shifted drastically from what he testified to during the actual trial. Spruill probably forgot his script regarding what he allegedly was suppose to say, after allegedly being coached by state authorities on the details regarding Evans’ alleged involvement in the Nekemar Pearson murder case. State prosecutors may have been successful in convincing jurors in the trial of James Evans and others, that Spruill was in fact a credible witness, but its clear that even state Appellate Court Justices were troubled by the manner in which the state (prosecutor Keith Jensen) used Spruill repeatedly as a witness in so many high profiled cases that just happened to be confessions of defendants facing serious crimes.

For example, Spruill testified during the Evans indictment that Evans had confessed to killing Pearson as they drove in a car together in the Alton neighborhood. He claimed then that Evans stated Brian Warr shot Pearson during a fight, and Evans implored him to finish the job, and then they took him into the back of Evans’ home where Warr shot Pearson again killing him. It should also be noted that Spruill’s testimony was in line with what Michael Hooks told the grand jury. While Hooks testified to not seeing the actual shooting, he stated that he simply heard two separate gun shots as he drove off. That’s exactly what Spruill testified to also in the Evans grand jury indictment hearing (two shots at the alleged crime scene).

The Grand Jury Testimony of Demond Spruill

During the actual trial Spruill’s testimony was noticeably different, while he admits that Evans told him Brian Warr shot Pearson, his account of the Evans’ confession shifts, now claiming during the trial that after Warr shot Pearson, Warr, Evans, and another man carried Pearson’s body into the basement of Evans’ home, and the trio later loaded Pearson into a vehicle suspected to belong to Evans’, drove to a wooded area near Godfrey Illinois where, according to Spruill’s new account, Evans claimed that he (not Warr) shot Pearson, killing him and leaving him for dead. That’s a big shift considering he essentially was an agent for the state in the volume of other trials involving serious crimes.

The Evans Trial Testimony of Demond Spruill

The alarming circumstances involving the Madison County prosecutor’s office consistently using Demond Spruill was public knowledge in the media, yet the state continues create inordinate delays in the post conviction relief of a volume of men whose criminal trial were impacted by Spruill’s testimony.

 

Clifton Wheeler

In the case of Clifton Wheeler lies perhaps the most blatant form of illegality that was committed during the Evans trial. Its clear based on the record that state prosecutor Keith Jensen implored Wheeler to lie under oath (subordination of perjury) during his testimony at the Evans trial, and even lied himself. Wheeler had already been convicted of killing a man name Dwight Riddlespriger and made a plea deal to serve 23 years in prison in exchange for his cooperation in the investigation of others involved in that murder, and for his cooperation in the investigation in the murder of Nekemar Pearson (fact).

“Everyone who gave prosecutorial testimony from the county jail had sentences reduced and charges dropped. They were instructed to lie to the trial jury and say they received no favors for their trial testimony.”

“They told Clifton Wheeler to involve me in a murder and make himself an accomplice. Clifton Wheeler was charged with the murder of Dwight Riddlespriger. He did 12 years for that murder (as a gift from prosecutors).”

    James Evans

Now I know that sounds completely insane that a man would falsely implicate himself in a murder to help prosecutors convict an innocent man but James Evans’ claims are in fact true when you look at the established record of his trial and subsequent appeals. (Read an excerpt from the Wheeler Trial and plea deal below. Use pdf tools to rotate if necessary)

The Court Proceeding of Clifton Wheeler

The Wheeler deal with state prosecutors was handled by Keith Jensen himself. So, if there wasn’t any shady dealings going on related to the Evans trial, then why on earth would Jensen allow one of his star witnesses, a man who says he was involved in the killing of Nekemar Pearson along with James Evans, allow him to lie in open court about not receiving any sentencing deals from the state. We all now know that it was a complete lie, and Wheeler had already cut a deal with Jensen for a 23 year sentence in his own murder case, in exchange for his cooperation in Evans’ murder trial (Nekemar Pearson). Jensen actually leads Wheeler into the lie, perjuring both of them right in open court (subordination of perjury). Regardless of whether the state will ever prosecute Jensen for his illegal actions during the Evans Trial for allegedly murdering Nekemar Pearson, Evans’ constitutional rights to a fair and impartial trial was violated, because Jensen along with the assistance of Clifton Wheeler misled the jury during the trial.

Clifton Wheeler Testimony at the James Evans Trial

“The court, we would ask the court to retain jurisdiction over this matter. And at any time, if any of the other people are sentenced to the penitentiary, we would ask the court to enter an order that Mr. Wheeler not be placed in the same penitentiary as any of the other people that he testifies or cooperates against.”

    Keith Jensen, Former Madison County Prosecutor

Rather than the order of jurisdiction being a measure to insure Clifton Wheeler’s safety in prison while he serves his 23 year plea deal sentence, it is quite possible that the request was made to insure that none of the defendants Wheeler testified against would never actually learn about his plea deal, because after all state prosecutor Jensen showed he was capable of covering up the fact that he used Wheeler to testify against others, while suppressing the plea arrangement he made with a convicted murderer. Jensen may have perjured himself in other trials in similar fashion as he clearly did in the Evans case, that’s an act of alleged misconduct that I’m sure he took extreme care to conceal.

After all, despite the plethora of allegations now surfacing about the Madison County judicial system, we must remember that Jensen also suppressed highly exculpatory evidence that would have been fruitful to the Evans defense during trial, and he would never have known the facts of Nekemar Pearson having been seen alive by a police officer ten days after he allegedly was supposed to have been kidnapped, and subsequently murdered by James Evans if an appellate defender working on a unrelated case hadn’t forwarded the exculpatory document to him years later into his sentence.

Detective Cooley Exculpatory Document

I’ll have more details about this very disturbing case. I’m not done just yet.

To Be Continued….

 

I’m Crime Blogger David Adams

The People’s Champion

 

 

 

 

 

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: The James Evans Frame Up By Alleged Dirty Rogue Cops Part II

The James Evans story isn’t about a drug dealer who some say killed another man in retaliation for a home invasion robbery, but perhaps his story is indeed about an obsession on one cops part, to have James Evans incarcerated by any means necessary. I’m told that when people came into detective Brad Wells’ office there were usually two pictures on his desk. A picture of Mr. Wells’ family and another picture of Mr. James Evans’ family. That’s a very interesting scenario when you consider all of the things that were published in local Alton newspapers and other media in the surrounding areas  back in the mid 1990’s when the Nekemar Pearson disappearance and subsequent murder were front page news.

Twenty years later, with Evans now incarcerated and serving time (over a 100 years) in an Illinois state prison, conversations regarding not only the Pearson murder, but other serious crimes that occurred in Alton during that time, and the police tactics that were used by Brad Wells and John Lakin to obtain indictments of James Evans and other black men, are starting to resurface. In fact, some of the claims are so alarming that they may become problematic for Wells and Lakin respectively, who are now prominent law enforcement officials in the state of Illinois. Wells the former “heavy handed” police detective who was well known on the streets throughout the community when he worked the streets of Alton, is now the Chief of Police in the town of Wood River, Illinois. John Lakin whose name is also on a plethora of documents and indictments for a volume of black men who now claim malicious prosecution, is in fact the current Sheriff of Madison County Illinois.

After viewing documents that have been forwarded to me and speaking with former and current citizens of Alton, my nearly 9 month inquiry into some extremely alarming allegations appear to be more than just chatter about convicts looking for a get out of jail card. If many of the allegations are in fact true, Wells and Lakin both could be indicted and sent to prison for decades themselves. Also, former Madison County Illinois prosecutor Keith Jensen could be on the hook as well for criminal allegations being made regarding the indictments of a volume of young black men from the Alton community over the years.

Is it true that Brad Wells was so obsessed with having James Evans thrown in jail forever, that he paid people who were facing criminal charges themselves, for their signed false statements to obtain a wrongful conviction of Evans? Is it true that Wells and Lakin both fabricated stories and then composed false witness statements, forced people with pending criminal charges to sign them under duress in exchange for lenient sentences, and all in collaboration with the Madison County Illinois prosecutors’ office to obtain indictments against James Evans and others? Is it true that Wells and Lakin literally snatched people of the streets and throw them in jail on trumped up charges as a scare tactic to get them to cooperate with their illegal criminal tactics? Is it true that Wells and Lakin solicited false statements from anyone (charged with a crime in Alton) willing to make a deal for leniency in their own criminal struggles, to help Wells and Lakin send an innocent man to Prison? Is it also true that Wells tried to use another murder suspect (A man name Larry Greer) by having him falsely testify against James Evans to make him eligible for the death penalty (Greer allegedly backed out of the deal after learning that prosecutors sought capitol punishment for Evans)? Why are people recanting their testimony against James Evans? Are any of these allegations true?

If any of the allegations against these two prominent police officials aren’t true, then there area a volume of other questions that must be answered to come to the correct conclusion. Why are there people who claim to have been harassed by Wells and Lakin now making some of these claims? Why are there people who have never had any brushes with the law back then nor in the past 20 plus years, now making these allegations? Why are people who are making these claims so afraid, that they don’t even drive through Madison County Illinois? Why have people who say they were falsely arrested and charged by Wells and Lakin to force them to sign false statements against James Evans living in other states after having fled Alton Illinois? Why?

More importantly, why are men like Larry Greer (pending post conviction appeal over 12 years), James Miller (pending post conviction appeal over 10 years), Jeffery Ewing (pending post conviction appeal over 15 years), Valdez Jordan (pending post conviction appeal over 15 years), along with others like Jeramy Brown (whose case was reversed by state Appellate Court), and Ramone Williams (whose case was reversed by state Appellate Court despite him having plead guilty for a lighter sentence) all claiming to have been wrongfully convicted? Also, how on earth did a known jail house informer name Demond Spruill just so happen to be the person that more than have of these men (including James Evans) confessed their alleged crimes to, as testified by Spruill during their respective criminal trials (fact)?

Furthermore, these allegations are just the tip of the iceburg of allegations that some say have been committed by Wells, Lakin, and former Madison County prosecutor Keith Jensen. False arrest charges, coercion of written statements, coercion of testimony under duress, and suppression of exculpatory evidence are just a few of the severe allegations being made against three prominent law enforcement officials. If any of these allegations are even remotely true, how on earth did these two cops arrive at their current post as top law enforcement officials in the state of Illinois?

These are some very serious questions that should be answered. A long time has past and some still remember intimate details of what happened in Madison County Illinois. As one person put it, “I am not sure how they do things down there now, but this is exactly how it was if you ran into trouble with the police in Madison County back in the mid 1990’s to early 2000’s.” However, from an outsider’s perspective while reading a volume of the articles published in the local press, its clear that James Evans and others were convicted within the media long before they were ever even inside of the Madison County Court House. So, at the very least it should be the duty of the local press to perform its due diligence in seeking the truth, and more importantly finding out why the NAACP Illinois state conference is supporting the Madison County Sheriff through political endorsements if these allegations have any merit what so ever. The local media should find out why the state continues to offer James Evans a plea deal to get out of prison in exchange for a guilty plea (something he has refused to do for years), while they hold him hostage by not timely acting upon certain post conviction appellate motions filed on Evans’ behalf. Also, with the volume of new evidence now surfacing, the local media should find out why James Evans’ hired legal counsel has suddenly stopped pursuing his appeals. Why?

Ultimately I find that there are so many people who remain afraid because of the terror they say they experienced at the hands of Wells and Lakin back in Alton and the Madison County prosecutor’s office, so much so that they are fearful for their very lives still today. Others say they “aren’t kids anymore, and it’s no longer 1995.” They just “want to do the right thing and tell the truth.” I’ll have more on this story in a series as details are still emerging….

To Be Continued…..

 

I’m Crime Blogger David Adams

The People’s Champion

 

Selflessness, Compassion, Enduring Faith, And Humanity: Why A Man Name John Reilly Encompasses What It Means To Be A Champion Of The People

During a very slow day on the job this past summer, I was seated at the surveillance camera controllers where I’m employed as a store detective, when my eye catches a glance of a man who was carrying a large backpack, and appeared to be walking in a hurried fashion (classic trait of a grab in run shoplifter). “Yeah, I think I’ll watch him for a minute,” I thought to myself. A short time later my instincts appeared to be spot on, while the man began looking around in a suspicious manner, as if he was hoping no one was watching him, when he began to remove a large Bluetooth speaker from its packaging, and started walking slowly toward the exit of our department store.

I watched him walk closer and closer to the exit in complete disbelief, baffled by how nonchalantly he walks in, picks up an item of merchandise, and appears to be ready to exit the store without attempting to pay for the item. I found it to be pretty brazen, but it’s simply common place in some cultures where people steal “in open sight,” as I have come to describe this kind of theft. I dash to the exit and position myself to stop him. I make the approach as he exits the store with the speaker in plain sight, identify myself as a store detective,  and before I had the opportunity to address the obvious (stolen merchandise), he confesses to stealing the item, becomes extremely apologetic, cooperative, and pleads for me not to have him arrested.

Knowing that the merchandise was of a monetary value that wouldn’t require me to prosecute him, I began to insure him that I wasn’t going to have him taken to jail as I escorted him to the office, placed him in the holding cell area, and explained that I would get him out of my custody as soon as possible. So, as I’m processing him and gathering his information, he begins to explain to me that he has never been in trouble with the law. I simply acknowledge him to let him know that I was listening (after all, of the hundreds of people I’ve apprehended for theft the past few years, it seems as if they all had a story to tell regarding why they were in such a predicament), and he said he had just hit a rough patch in life. He explained that he had only stolen the item so he could sell it to purchase something to eat (moved by his comment, I began listening more intently).

He went on to say that he had been self employed for over 25 years, but experienced a fire at his Fairfield Connecticut home a few years back, lost everything to the fire, lost his business, and became homeless. So, he started living on the streets trying to survive the best way he could, and doing simply what he had to do to eat. It was a moving story, but the nature of my line of work requires me to desensitize myself, and process every case per company policy. I do recall however, that the day he was released from our office, I was glad that I didn’t have to compound his personal struggles any further by having him prosecuted for theft.

Meanwhile, a young colleague and fellow detective (John Reilly) would encounter a man standing just outside of the mall entrance on his way to work every day. The man (who I’ll only identify as JP) was homeless and would often ask John and others for spare change to help him get something to eat. John gave this middle age African American man (whose name was also John) a few dollars on several occasions. One day out of curiosity John asked him, what was his situation and why he doesn’t have a job? JP told John the same story he gave me about the house fire, losing his business, and his plight of being homeless. Having the capacity to empathize with his situation, John decided that he wanted to do more for JP besides just give him a few bucks here and there, because he appeared healthy, intelligent, and capable of maintaining a job.

John suggested that JP simply go online and look for a job. John told him there are all kinds of jobs online that he could apply for. JP told John that he only had a GED, a little college studying Theology, and didn’t have access to the internet, and even if he did, he wouldn’t know how to use it to apply for a job. That’s when the real humanity of this story began. John started gathering personal information from JP until he had a enough to compose an actual resume for him. John would apply for various jobs on Indeed.com and other employment websites for JP in an effort to help him overcome his homelessness and personal troubles.

John continued to apply for jobs for JP and continued to communicate with him on a regular basis to check on him, to see if he was okay, and to help him stay encouraged that a change would eventually come. John would also learn that the man was married, and naturally due to his circumstances, their relationship was on the rocks. This made John even more determined to help the man succeed and rekindle his relationship with his wife. It was all a waiting game now, and John (who is a God Fearing man himself) believed that God would deliver JP at any moment.

One day on the job while John was cleaning up and purging photographs that are taken of shoplifters, he comes across the image that I took of JP back during the summer when I apprehended him for shoplifting. John search the record database in the office, and discovered that I was the detective who apprehended JP, but he never let me or any one on our staff know how he had been helping JP. John did eventually advise JP what he does for a living and where he works. JP simply replied “oh okay.” and didn’t say anything about his shoplifting incident, so John just let it go, and continued to support JP’s efforts to get back on his feet.

On December 19, 2018 just before Christmas all of the efforts that John Reilly had put into helping JP find a job, finally came to fruition. One of the jobs that John had applied for (Maintenance Technician) responded to his application. It would eventually resolve into a direct letter from the CEO with a job offer, maintaining housing apartments, and preparing apartments for occupancy when tenants move out. The job came with an on sight apartment (immediately resolving JP’s homeless situation), 401K, medical, dental, vacation time, keys to the building, personal cellphone, company uniforms, and more. JP moved in and started on January 2, 2019.

The apartment complex where JP will now live and work has a Maintenance Technician.

So, when I received a text message from John Reilly early yesterday morning, with him inquiring whether I remembered this man? I was puzzled because the text didn’t have an image attached, but John sent the picture of JP along with a text that read. “This is that homeless guy that you apprehended,” and I instantly remembered him and the unfortunate circumstance of our encounter. John advised me that he had helped JP get a job and that he was no longer homeless. Knowing how excited John gets about the smallest thing, all I could do was just imagine his facial expressions at that very moment.

On my way into work yesterday morning I couldn’t help but think how many times we as a society have walked pass a homeless person, and simply discarded them as a nuisance without offering the smallest assistance. I believe I only know one man who has actually taken time out of his life to write resumes, cover letters, and apply to various jobs online for a homeless man that he didn’t even know. That man name is John Reilly. “John the beneficent” from this day forth.

JP’s story is a classic American tale of personal triumph in the face of darkness, despair, and homelessness. That all changed when he met a young white guy with a degree of wisdom, compassion, and humanity greater than his years on this earth. Despite the negativity of our current political climate in this country, that has been creating divisiveness among race and class, it speaks volumes when these kinds of stories emerge, and reveal the true spirit of what humanity actually looks and feel like. God Bless John Reilly, God Bless JP, and may God Bless us all. John Reilly is a real “People’s Champion,” and I tip my hat to him.

 

“The Only Thing Necessary For Evil To Prevail, Is For God Men To Stand By Idle And Do Nothing.”

— Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

 

I’m Crime Writer David B. Adams

The People’s Champion

 

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: How Another Black Man Name James Evans Was Framed In An Illinois Murder Case (Part I)

Like so many cases that I have been made aware of over the years, his case was unsolicited, and brought to my attention by one of his friends. I don’t know him, nor do I know anyone in the town of Alton Illinois. It was a very close friend of Mr. James Evans who sought my assistance in bringing light to his case. Now having served nearly twenty years in an Illinois state prison for a 1995 murder that he denies having committed, I was asked to help give him a voice. In fact, I’ve even received a copy of a letter from Mr. Evans that highlights the most critical aspects of his appeal regarding his murder conviction. The letter appears to be a general letter that he may have composed to issue to anyone who would give him an ear pertaining to his plight. Then there are the volume of documents his supporters forwarded me to help make his case.

After reviewing the initial documents I received I became somewhat hesitant after learning that Evan’s case appeared to be predicated on a drug case at the height of America’s purported war on drugs. The drug element of his case and the fact that he had already been convicted, presented a tremendous upheaval for his appeal, and I wondered to myself how I could best help him. Admittedly though, I was cautious because of past cases where I have assisted those criminally charged, only to have them bail out by coping a plea deal after years of work by me and others who fought to highlight highly exculpatory details regarding their case. I soon learned after digging into the documents that were sent to me,that his case wasn’t just an average case where a convict was simply trying to get out of prison. It’s often said jokingly that every man in a state correctional facility is innocent. Mr. Evan’s case is no joking matter and he actually has the evidence to prove his innocence.

The documents I received were transcripts from his grand jury indictment, witness affidavits composed after his conviction, news articles, and other legal documents that not only depict exculpatory evidence that exonerates Mr. Evans, but also points to a potential pattern of corruption, conspiracy to convict an innocent man, and other actions by law enforcement and state prosecutors that could result in criminal charges for many of these officials who were involved in his criminal case. Now that’s a brash statement declaring corruption and criminal activity by those charged with upholding the law in the state of Illinois, a charge that we’ve heard countless times before by convicted criminals, but Mr. Evans actually has documents related to his case that are very compelling and may help to prove his case, and free him from prison in a wrongful conviction.

I really don’t know if Mr. Evans (also known on the streets as “Raven”) was in fact a drug dealer. Those were the claims of many witnesses who testified against him during his trial, and considering the time in our country when this murder took place, the very mentioning of drug soliciting may have been sufficient to secure a conviction, as drug dealing and violent murder were a national epidemic in this country at that time. However, it should be noted that many of these same witnesses who testified against Mr. Evans were also embroiled within the Illinois criminal justice system pending criminal charges of their own, and either had their charges dropped, reduced, given lenient plea deals for their crimes, and in some instances were even paid money by police and the prosecutor’s office after having testified against Mr. Evans during his murder trial (fact).

The murder victim (Mr. Nekemar Pearson) who was also accused of a previous murder himself (a man name William Nicholes), allegedly went missing on June 23, 1995. Pearson was on court order to be at home by 6 p.m., and was reported missing by his mother on June 24th after he failed to come home at the court ordered prescribed time. There had been a barbecue in the community in Alton where Evans and Pearson both lived. Witnesses accounts state that Evans was the last person to be seen with Pearson at or somewhere near the barbecue before he disappeared (it was rumored that Pearson may have been on the lame (hiding from relatives of Nicholes) after fleeing relatives of a man he was accused of murdering, while they pursued him on foot and in vehicles the day he went missing). A crucial factor to consider in the disappearance and subsequent murder of Nekemar Pearson, is the day he went missing was in fact the 1 year anniversary of the date he allegedly killed Will Nicholes. During the grand jury indictment of James Evans (who police claim killed Pearson with the help of  Brian Warr and Clifton Wheeler) testimony was given, that during the police investigation of Pearson’s murder, police officials were offering cash for information that would implicate Evans, Warr, and Wheeler in the killing. Affidavits show that some of the same cops practice similar tactics in the criminal cases of others, and perhaps their illegal tactics were the sole reason they were able to secure a conviction against James Evans;

Police officials claim that Evans was a drug dealer and he had impregnated Pearson’s girlfriend, and in retaliation they say Pearson kidnapped Evans, robbed him of cash, stole his chevy blazer, and throw him out of the vehicle. Pearson then allegedly took Evan’s truck and removed expensive speakers from the vehicle and sold them on the streets. After these events allegedly occurred, it was rumored that Pearson went throughout the community bragging about what he had done to Evans, and cops claim that Pearson was murdered by Evans with the help of another man name Brian Warr ( who was also murdered later on, and after admitted false testimony, Evans was convicted of soliciting Warr’s murder). From the grand jury indictment hearing and investigative tactics carried out by Alton police officials, the case against James Evans was on shaky ground from the very start.

Depending of which witness you believe, if any at all, you’ll find that most of the information provided in the indictment hearing was all based on hearsay and street talk, which was even pointed out during the hearing itself by one of the grand jurors (Click below link to view an excerpt from the Evans Indictment hearing, as witness Michael Hooks testifies about cops offering money for information to obtain and arrest for Evans, Warr, and another man).

Grand Jury Money Testimony

The prosecution’s theories regarding how and where Pearson was killed was never firmly established for the jury during the actual trial. The testimony of many of the state’s witnesses also changed from their grand jury testimony, to what they testified to during Evans’ actual murder trial. The state has contended that Evans duct taped Pearson and put him in his basement, until he placed Pearson inside the trunk of his car, drove to a wooded area in Godfrey Illinois, shot Pearson multiple times, and left him to die. These allegations are listed as facts in the state of Illinois Appellate Court for the 5th District, ruling in James Evans’ appeal of his conviction. In the decision, the court highlights that Tommie Rounds, Demond Spruill, and Larry Greer all testified that Evans had confessed these facts to them during the trial. (Spruill was an “agent of the state” some believe, because of the volume of court cases where he somehow ended up sharing a cell with inmates on trial for serious crimes, and they all just so happened to confess their guilt to him. The Appellate Court also chastised the judge in many cases for their repeated use of Spruill to obtain jailhouse confessions. Larry Greer was a drug addict and admitted liar, who police officials paid cash money for his false testimony, and threatened him with arrest if he didn’t cooperate). Many of the facts that the state and its witnesses claimed are outlined in the Appellate ruling of Evans’ appeal. Click the link to read an excerpt from the ruling.

Appellate Court Ruling

Even the state’s theory of how and where Pearson was gunned down appears to shift. Michael Hook’s testimony during the grand jury indictment contrast drastically from the actual trial transcript that’s described in Evans’ Appellate ruling. Hook’s grand jury testimony places the shooting of Pearson across the street from where the barbecue was taking place and behind Evans’ home. While Hook claimed to hear several gunshots as he pulled off, the fact remains that no one else reported hearing gun fire on the day of the barbecue. The details contained in Hook’s testimony and after weighing the content of the trial transcript, Hook might have been coerced into his testimony, but may have forgotten what he was suppose to say. His testimony was so off base from the state’s theory, that it makes you wonder why he was even called as a state’s witness during the indictment hearing. No one corroborates Hook’s story, and no forensic evidence was ever obtained that established as a matter of fact, that Pearson had been shot behind Evans’ home. Its just remarkable how Hook was a state witness who testified against Evans, and his testimony didn’t even match what the state prosecutors had actually alleged had occurred. (Click the link below to read how Hook’s testimony contrast to the state’s theory of what happened (outlined in Evans’ Appellate ruling), and how his testimony is different from the state’s claim that Evans beat Pearson, but rather allegedly witnessing Pearson being attacked by Brian Warr and others near Evans’ home).

Michael Hook’s Grand Jury Testimony

Hook’s testimony also aligned with other’s who say Evans admitted to them that he beat Pearson so severely that he broke his hand in the process. Although Evans’ lawyer was initially apprehensive regarding having x-rays conducted on Evans’ hands, at Mr. Evans’ insistence, the state was allowed to have Evans transported to a St Louis Missouri area hospital to obtain x-rays of Mr. Evans’ hands. The results were conclusive that Evans did in fact have a broken hand, but it had been checked and verified by police as having occurred in 1993. The doctor who conducted Evans’ court ordered examination, reported that Evans in fact did not have any new hand fractures other that the documented fracture from 1993. Such a discovery would usually weigh heavy on the testimony of those who say Evans confessed to them having killed Pearson and broke his hand in the process. (Click below links for excerpt from court transcript of state requesting examination of Evans’ hands and doctor’s x-ray report of Evans’ hand).

Excerpt From Transcript With State Requesting X-ray

Doctor’s X-ray Report

The state’s failed attempt to corroborate witness accounts that Evans had confessed and claimed he broke his hand after beating Pearson, was not the only highly exculpatory piece of evidence that would emerge in the James Evans’ murder conviction case. In 2001 a state appellate defender (Dan W. Evers) who was looking through the folder of Larry Greer after the documents had been sent to their office (who testified during Evans’ trial that James had confessed to killing Nekemar Pearson) and found a highly exculpatory document that the state had never turned over to Mr. Evans’ defense counsel as required by law. The document was a police report written by an Alton police Detective (J. Cooley) who knew the victim in Evans’ murder case (Nekemar Pearson) very well. According to the report, the officer observed Pearson and another youth walking down the street on July 3,  1995 (ten days after Pearson had allegedly went missing). The officer was certain that it was Pearson, because he was a liaison officer at the Alton high school  where Pearson attended, and the officer had several encounters with him. The officer was certain that it was Pearson because he stirred directly at him. Later that day the officer discovered that there was in fact a missing persons report outstanding for Pearson. The officer wrote an affidavit to document having saw Pearson alive and well. (Click links below to view Appellate defender’s notice to Evans regarding exculpatory evidence, the exculpatory document that was found after his conviction,and an affidavit from the law clerk of Evans’ defense team who testified never having received the discovery document from the state).

State Appellate Defender Notice To James Evans

Detective Cooley Exculpatory Document

Defense Team Law Clerk Affidavit

It should be no surprise to anyone that such an egregious act of prosecutorial misconduct could occur in a criminal case of this nature. The fact that the document even exist, speaks volumes of the certainty that Detective Cooley had of having seen Nekemar Pearson alive on July 3, 1995. It would have been an extremely pertinent element of Mr. Evans’ defense had the state turned the document over to his legal team. Essentially, Evans was convicted of murdering a man on June 23 or 24, 1995, when its highly probable that he was alive and well 10 days after the day in which James Evans’ conviction states he was killed. Its highly doubtful that all jurors seated in Evans’ murder trial would have ruled to convict him beyond a reasonable doubt. Even if the officer was mistaken when he said he saw Pearson alive, it still was evidence favorable to Evans’ defense and should have been turned over. The document now raises serious doubt regarding the credibility of witnesses who testified against Evans, coupled with other newly discovered evidence and affidavits by some of those who testified against him and who are now recanting their statements, after citing police coercion of testimony, and testifying under duress after being threatened with arrest. Please continue to follow this story as I shed light on the plight of James Evans who continues to fight for his freedom.

(Other documents emerge which point to police corruption and coercion of witnesses to obtain a conviction of Mr. James Evans, for a murder he didn’t commit).

TO BE CONTINUED…

 

The People’s Champion

I’m Crime Blogger David Adams

Starbucks Is The New Battle Ground For Social Change: Philadelphia Coffee House Illuminates Jim Crow White Space Culture

I believe it was just a few years before my father past away when he told me not to get involved with women who call the police on you. Our parents raised four boys and much of the life lessons we were taught were predicated on character, respect, and it was a major taboo if we ever caught putting our hands on a female. My dad’s issue was that some black woman will call the police out of anger, emotions, and in an effort to be vindictive without you having to do anything at all. Having come up in the heart of the civil rights movement, our parents were all too familiar with police culture and how the criminal justice system treated black people. In short, dad’s argument was that the police are bad business, nothing good happens when black men in particular encounter police, and all it takes is for a person to make an accusation against you, especially from a woman and you’ve already been convicted on sight.

The police relationship with the black community has never been exactly cordial, and for the most part the relationship has only been very tenuous at best. In fact the police has always seemingly served as an invigilator over the black community to keep our people in check. oppressed, and in our proper subservient place. The existence of an obvious fear of blacks by white people have a long history, stemming from myths of violent retribution from a black insurrection that is believed to have been promoted by those in power, to flame racial strife between the races, and also caused massive white flight from large metropolitan cities after the fall of Jim Crow and segregation in this country. The separatist who create such fear of blacks are also the architects of an abhorrent tactic of terror within their own white communities which depict the black man meting out his ultimate desire to conquer the white man’s greatest prize, the white woman. This is a myth that has spread pervasive fear in whites for centuries.

Therefor, much like the times of slavery, the police serve as overseers of black people to protect the white establishment, and there are racist whites who have been using police as an agent to further exploit their bigotry and race hate. Its no secret and an unspoken rule within the black community that when white people call the police on blacks for non crime related matters, it sends a message that a black person has gotten out of their place and need to be corralled back in. Now, with the volume of police shootings of unarmed black men whose encounters with the police in many instances are typically very minor, some black leaders are arguing that having the police called on a black man by a white person in this era means that you must die. Now some people might think that’s an exaggeration, but the spike in racial outburst by whites in places typically known to be white spaces is a clear indicator that a visceral hatred of black people continues to persist in this country. Some will argue that its all due to who our 45th President is, but I disagree. The manner in which people have become so emboldened in spewing racial epithets in public only exemplifies a perpetuation of bigotry that already existed. The 45th President just gave many of these cowardice racist a platform to spew their venom.

The incident that happened in a Philadelphia Starbucks coffee shop the other day where two black men who asked to use the restroom were denied access, were told that only paying customers are permitted to use the facilities (ignoring the fact that they may actually be paying customers), and when the men sat down to wait on a friend for a business meeting, a manager called the police on them for trespassing, probably with the belief that they possibly couldn’t afford to buy Starbucks items. The men were subsequently handcuffed and carted off to jail. While they would eventually be set free nine hours later due to Starbucks declining to pursue criminal charges, the incident isn’t isolated to a Center City Philly coffee house. In Southern California at another Starbucks a young black man name Brandon Ward asked a Starbucks employee why he was denied access to the store’s restroom when a white customer was granted access. Ward posted a video capturing a white customer exiting the restroom, and his interaction with the young white male, and learning that he wasn’t precluded from using the restroom without making a purchase.

The revelation of the California video creates a very slippery slope for the Coffee magnet, as the employee who identified herself as the store manager was also captured on the video retrieving the police to have Mr. Ward dealt with, who was the customer she told to leave the store when he began filming her response to his inquiries regarding the unfairness of the establishment’s restroom policy. However, as the company’s CEO tried to do damage control over the incidents due to the outpouring of support for the two black men with protest, the public outcry has seemingly developed into a prima facie case of implicit bias toward blacks that can now be lodged against the Starbucks company as a whole. The same kind of behavior over the use of restroom facilities in two company stores thousands of miles apart doesn’t take rocket science to ascertain that racial profiling by Starbucks employees appears to be a culture of racism that permeates the coffee chain from coast to coast.

It also should be highlighted that in both incidents neither of the black males became loud, belligerent, violent or displayed any aggression what so ever, but had the police notified on them solely for their refusal to comply with an agent of any white establishment who ordered them back in their place where a black person should be. It speaks volumes of how this country is so programed with a public policy for difficult black people, for black people who make a white person feel uncomfortable, threatened, and otherwise invade spaces overtly veiled for patrons of white privilege. Also its interesting to note that the employee involved in the Southern California Starbucks incident appeared to be non white, but was expediently and defiantly prepared to handle Brandon Ward indifferently as a man of color without provocation for no reason other than for implicit bias and racism. It all captivates a prescribed methodology orchestrator for handling black people who get beside themselves, which gives further credence to the belief that when a white person calls the cops of a black man, you just might die today.

In many of the incidents involving police having been notified about a black person for literally no crime at all, in many of these instances, a white person used the cops as their personal racism valets. In fact, every year, there are cases where white Americans actively and knowingly use the police as an extension of their personal bigotry yet face no consequences. The men and women making these outrageous and unwarranted calls to police, which result in the harassment, unfair prosecution and even death of people of color, need to be found, publicly shamed and prosecuted to the full extent that the law allows. Meanwhile, the black community as a whole must develop better strategies for dealing with racism in this country, and for the life of us (literally) we must adopt a public policy on police when they encounter us within this racist American society.

 

The People’s Champion

I’m Crime Writer David B. Adams

 

A Black Panther’s Last Stand: The Perilous Fight Of America’s Last Political Prisoner Mumia Abu Jamal Persist

While many within the black community are now mesmerized by the Marvel film Black Panther, which is based on a futuristic fantasy of a technologically advanced African Nation called Wakanda, the perils of a true Panther is continuously embroiled in a realistic fight for justice, for judicial correctness, and the power of people’s longevity in a fight to free a convicted “cop killer” despite the mountain of evidence that suggest not only his innocence, but that police along with a corrupt prosecutor’s office consciously framed former Black Panther Mumia Abu Jamal. He has never obtained nearly as much support from black people in this country as the fictional comic book character Black Panther has garnered.

Dubbed all over the world as a political prisoner, Jamal’s decades old fight for freedom has garnered international attention, and for 37 years Abu Jamal has continuously maintained his innocence in the killing of Philadelphia Police Officer Daniel Faulkner. A former member of the Black Panthers party, Mumia was already a prominent journalist and activist at the time of the incident. He has always claimed his innocence and people around the world have stood in solidarity with him since then, organizing events, spreading information and petitioning authorities to “Free Mumia.” In fact if you don’t know his story, then perhaps you haven’t been living on the planet earth the past 40 years.

Followers of his globally renowned case say that many within the African American community have failed Mumia. Although he continues to maintain tremendous support from Black America, the base of his support has always primarily come from social groups, governments, and other human rights organizations from outside of the United States. His case has always been racially biased and politically motivated. Mumia was framed by the Philadelphia police department and the prosecution, with help from the Attorney General’s office and the FBI, because he was so outspoken in his defense of the oppressed, particularly the politically oppressed, such as the MOVE organization at that time in Philadelphia.

In fact, Mumia’s troubles began during his teen years when he was the Minister of Information for the Philadelphia branch of the Black Panther party. When Mumia’s COINTELPRO records were obtained from the U.S. government, it showed that they had a dossier on him when he was just 15 years old, in the late ‘sixties. There they said, in effect, despite his young years, he should be on the ADEX file (a list of who the FBI felt should be rounded up and put into concentration camps if there was any political turmoil in the country). They said Mumia belonged on that list because of his ability to speak out in advocacy. Mumia was also once featured in a front-page story in the Philadelphia Inquirer, which described this young man who was speaking out in defense of the Panthers and against police brutality. The cops in Philadelphia knew who he was and they were tracking him.

So there is a long history there of knowing who Mumia was, targeting him, trying to silence his voice and ultimately to murder him. What happened on the night of December 9, 1981 was that Mumia came across a police altercation in the street. He was driving a cab at that point because he had been drummed out of mainstream news reporting for his defense of the MOVE organization. In the midst of a purported shoot-out, a police officer named Daniel Faulkner was shot and killed. Depending upon who you believe, the events of that night are perplexing to say the very least. Shady witnesses, coerced witness testimony, crime scene manipulation, crooked cops, and a corrupt prosecutor’s office would all culminate in the successful prosecution and subsequent conviction of Mumia Abu Jamal.

Several people have testified against him, claiming he’s the man they saw shooting Faulker. Some have said they saw a third man shooting and running (those accounts were thrown out by the judge presiding over the initial trial). Others have even confessed they were the shooters themselves (The confession of Arnold Beverly) acting as hit men for the police, who commissioned them to get rid of Faulker as he was interfering with their corrupt businesses (The first working day after Abu Jamal’s trial and conviction were completed, 30 Philadelphia cops were indicted in the “Center City” police corruption sting), giving tremendous credibility to the allegation that dirty Philly cops wanted the young cop (Faulkner) dead, but despite a volume of compelling evidence regarding the case against Abu Jamal, his conviction stood, and for thirty years he was on death row until his punishment was commuted to life in prison without the possibility of parole in 2011. Now a potential new front has opened up in the fight to free Mumia Abu-Jamal.

About a year ago, in a different case, after many attempts to get a ruling, it was found that it is a conflict of interest and a denial of a fair and impartial appeal process to allow a judge to sit, who had previously been personally involved in a significant fashion in the earlier prosecution of the same case. Basically, it required all the appeals that a judge had sat on, and that had been negatively decided against the defendant, to be thrown out and to be able to start over again.

This ground breaking judicial ruling, now case law, applies directly to Abu Jamal, and specifically his appeals. In a very important case that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. It involved the fact that one of the justices who became the Chief Justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Ronald Castille, had been the prosecutor in Philadelphia, following Rendell as the chief DA. He had been a DA and ran on a law-and-order platform, and was endorsed and received major funding from the Fraternal Order of Police. Nonetheless, when he became a Philadelphia Supreme Court justice he sat and ruled on a number of cases, including Mumia’s case, despite  Abu Jamal’s requests for him to remove himself on grounds of bias and conflict of interest. When Castille became a state supreme court justice, he had already been the architect of all the DA’s support of Mumia’s conviction.

Many instances in Mumia’s case, and with all the challenges to Mumia’s conviction that began in 1995 and went on through 2008, Castille refused to removed himself from the case and instead ruled against Mumia in each of these cases. The argument is now being made in conjunction with the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that Castille violated the fundamental precept that as a prosecutor involved in the case he should never have sat as a judge, especially in adjudication of any Mumia Abu Jamal cases.  Mumia has finally gotten some compelling arguments. The DA’s office tried to get it thrown out on grounds that it was brought too late and didn’t apply anymore. The judge ruled that it did in fact apply and that the case should go forward. Now it has become an issue of the DA’s office being ordered to produce evidence that shows Castille’s involvement in Abu Jamal’s cases. They have been noncompliant with the order and recalcitrant in not providing real information, instead provided no record of his involvement in Mumia’s case.

Now the Philadelphia’s DA office is stonewalling, pretending that Castille’s involvement in Mumia’s prosecution and appeals didn’t exist. They are concealing evidence and refuse to open their files. it will take more political pressure and protesting to further agitate justice for Mumia. Now, Mumia is 63 years old and is suffering from cirrhosis due to the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections purposefully, and consciously mistreating his hepatitis C disease. We must continue to agitate his injustice conviction. Free Mumia Abu Jamal now!

 

The People’s Champion

I’m Crime Blogger David B Adams

 

Racial Profiling In America At Its Best: Profiling Of Two Black Rockhurst University Women Highlights Dining While Black In Missouri

Can you image spending hours of free time shopping at your local mall? Its a pass time shared by many American women for generations. At some point though, all of that foot work tends to wear down on consumers, and most venues have various places to eat within the facility, like a food court, and some malls even have family style restaurants where shoppers can sit in and dine. For two Kansas City, Missouri black women a trip to the mall and a dinner afterwards would prove to be very compelling, as to why the NAACP has declared the entire state a Missouri unsafe” for black Americans.

A video which is now going viral was posted on the Facebook page of Alexis Brison depicting two black women who are students at Rockhurst University in Kansas City, Misoouri, encountering police at an Independence area Applebee’s Family restaurant. In the caption above the video Brison writes “Hey facebook friends and family I need your help reposting this. Especially in black history month black people cannot continue to be treated this way. My friend and I were shopping at the independence center in independence, Missouri(Near Kansas City), when we were done we decided to get a bite to eat at Applebee’s. About an hour into out dinner we were approached by a Independence police officer, a mall cop, and the restaurant manager. We were told that we were accused of eating and not paying for CHICKEN the day before (dining and dashing). Mind you that we have proof that can show our whereabouts and it’s not even in our character to steal. After being mocked, humiliated, and embarrassed we were asked to pay for our food, leave, and not come back. After leaving, calls were made to the restaurant and the manager stated that our accuser remembered that there was a SKINNY girl and a girl who wore MAKEUP. In 2018 is this really what we’re debased to? Our weight and whether or not we wore makeup. She could not recognize any facial features or any defining characteristics . This is a clear example of RACIAL PROFILING that should not be stood for. Just because we are black does not mean we are all criminals and I will not be treated as such.”

Brison’s commentary is needed to give context to what actual occurred in the video, because where the clip starts doesn’t necessarily give a clear picture of what’s happening. The young ladies make it clear that they haven’t been to the restaurant, state they haven’t done anything, and at one point just wanted to pay for their food and leave. Mean while the Independence police officer who is accompanied by a mall security officer, and the restaurant manager appear to down play the situation and even jokingly stated, “make sure you get my good side” refering to the women filming the incident on their cellphones. He was even rebuffed by one of the women after he repeatedly tried to blow the incident off as not a big deal. The officer stated to the women, “You all are getting worked up for nothing.” One of the women replied, “this is too big of an accusation to call it nothing.”

Then one of the women telephoned a relative and explained to them their situation. The women repeatedly stated that they aren’t from the town and haven’t been to Applebee’s. As the phone is recording you can see what appears to be a white female standing next to the booth then walking away after stating that she is almost positive that it was these two women, which gives credibility to their claim of having been accused of not paying for a previous meal yesterday. One of the women begins to become visibly upset and starting crying. The video goes blank for periods of time, but their is still audio. The women (Asia) tells the women she telephoned to come to the restaurant because it wasn’t funny what was happening to them. The police officer is overheard stating “Wow! Is she always this emotional?” His demeanor was unprofessional, apathetic toward her emotions, and lacked any compassion at all for these young women despite only having mere allegations having been lodged against them.

While reading the Facebook thread where many followers of the story have commented, many took note of the officer’s disposition and the sarcastic comments he made, even though this young woman was visibly distraught. Its not a defining moment on race in that town, because with the high profile protest following police shootings of Michael Brown and Anthony Lamar Smith in the state of Missouri with both cops being found not guilty, racism in Missouri is common place. Followers should be more cognizant of the fact that white police officers are capable of displaying such apathy toward emotional black women. In fact some even believe that his tactics were purposeful, in hopes of getting the two women to become disruptive so that they could exact an arrest. We can see this clearly when the officer continuously ask the women “Am I yelling at you?” Neither of the two women were yelling, perhaps a little intense due to the accusations against them, but neither of them yelled at the police.

The women were upset and probably felt that they were going to be arrested. I’m not sure why the officer didn’t understand why the woman was so distraught. He appeared to have a serious problem with the fact that she was crying. He orders them to stop talking over him and to listen to him. Then he explains that the restaurant has requested that they pay for their meal leave and never come back. The women both agreed and appeared eager to get out of there after realizing they weren’t going to be arrested. There was back and forth about the check and Asia began crying uncontrollably, while the woman on the phone and her friend tried to calm her. You could here Crissy (on the phone) attempting to instruct Asia on what pertinent information she needed to obtain. Her crying for many was simply unbearable, and the officer’s sarcastic and carefree demeanor made it worst. The women left the restaurant upset and I’m sure embarrassed, and humiliated.

However, if we take a look at the entire situation we see that while they were accused of skipping out on a check the day prior, the women were seated, had their order taken, and served by the wait staff. It wasn’t until an hour into their meal that they were approached by the police regarding the theft accusation. Let’s face it, none of the followers of this story were there during this incident, don’t know if the women did in fact commit theft of food the day before, but we have to admit, if the allegations were in fact true, these two women are probably two of the most dumbest criminals ever. With that being said, its simply unconscionable and highly unlikely that they would be so brazen to reappear in the same restaurant the very next day. The waitress didn’t even seem certain herself if they were the correct women, and if so, why did they take their orders and serve them their food while possibly risking having them walk out without paying again. That’s just common sense, and they know the women shopuld have been approached about the theft at the door.

Also, was there surveillance footage that captured the two women who left without paying the day before, and was those images compare to the two women seated the day of this incident? If not, the cops and the restaurant risk potential liability based on the unfounded accusations alone. The cellphone video that the women captured will go a long way in a civil case to prove why punitive damages should be awarded to these ladies. If I’m a manager I’m not calling the cops on a customer based on speculation alone. I need proof that these are the right people simply to avoid civil liability against myself and the company. That clearly wasn’t the case in this instance. A waitress speculating that “I’m pretty sure its them” doesn’t pass the smell test. The waitress who made the accusation should be fired and the manager should be terminated as well. Even if the women did commit the theft, the restaurant nor the police presented evidence to prove that they did.

This entire incident appeared to be more about discouraging black patrons from dining at this establishment, because without definitive proof that these ladies had committed a crime, the cops should never have been notified. Making a customer feel like they’re about to get arrested is grounds for a very good lawsuit. These kind of practices may even be more widespread and not necessarily isolated to this case. I wouldn’t even be surprised if this was a trend by black patrons at this establishment to walk out without paying for food, but like Alexis Brison stated in her commentary to the video, “Just because she’s black doesn’t make her a criminal,” and restaurants and other businesses must be certain that they are accurate when bringing criminal charges against consumers who patronize their establishments. Which brings me to a vital point and a lesson that many of our young people can learn from this kind of experience. With the racial climate in this country, these kinds of racial flare ups are going to become increasingly more frequent. Therefor, we must be vigilant, remain calm, and be mindful to obtain as much pertinent information as possible.

I’m quite sure the young sister who was crying uncontrollably probably was very distraught and traumatized by this incident, it wasn’t helpful to allow anger, hurt, and frustration to consume her to the point that she lost focus on what was important at that moment. We must train our young people to be cooperative at all times (these two women were), especially when you know that you haven’t done anything wrong. Get names, times, and the date of the incident to have as reference later on. You might think that with the current racial climate in the state of Missouri alone, some might take pause to consider their actions out of fear of being labeled racist, but in this instance I believe they deemed these two young African American women as vulnerable and simply didn’t care nor feared potential consequences. Applebee’s must be held accountable to in sure there are no more “dining while black incidents in America.”

The Applebees Restaurant in question information:

Applebees Restaurant

Corporate Headquarters HQ

Adress:

8140 Ward Parkway

Kansas City, MO 64114

Phone Numbers:

Customer Service – 888-592-7753

Additionally, Dine Equity owns Applebees and IHOP, so don’t support IHOP either.

Dine Equity

50 North Brand Boulevard 7th Floor

Glendale, CA 91203

Corporate – 818-24-6055

 

The People’s Champion

I’m David Adams

- See more at: http://thepeopleschampion.me/wp-admin/options-general.php?page=side-tab#sthash.HEuco14y.dpuf